Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 3682260" data-attributes="member: 1465">If 160 pages is a must, then I think it should be restricted to a max level, like you mentioned before, in order to fit all spells and items. I don't think I would be a good idea to eliminate some spells only because they are less popular, unless they are completely unseen.Still I think that monsters should not be included. It's very hard to choose 40 monsters only. Chances would be good that very soon the DM wants a second book, and there we'd lose the idea of a single book at the table...If you can accept of having at least some extra paper brought to the table together with the book, then the problem is solved: no monsters wasting space in the book, and only those few monsters to be used in a session brought to the game.Otherwise you really need a "dynamic book" that you could change every session.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>