Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 5807951" data-attributes="member: 1465">I agree with those who say that combat roles are pidgeonholes.I think that classes should represent iconic roles in the story and in the campaign as a whole: fighters fights, rogues explore, clerics protects & heals, wizards cast wondrous spells, bards suck, and so on.But that should remain fairly general, and not become a design constraint (which is even worse than a play constraint) like it happened when they rationalized too much the tactical roles in combat. There's no reason why we can't have one tank fighter, one striker fighter, one tactical/controller fighter and so on.</blockquote>