Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MuhVerisimilitude" data-source="post: 9328499" data-attributes="member: 7042567">Each wizard should be more narrow. No more generalist wizards who are better than the specialists at their schtick.I picture wizards picking a main focus. This focus gives them access to spells of a very narrow theme. For example teleportation. This wizard can now mainly do teleportation magic. If you want to extend beyond this you can, but preparing spells outside of your focus lowers the peak potential of your focus type spells.In short: You have a bunch of spell slots and they must all be from your focus, but you can optionally prepare spells not from your focus in &quot;external&quot; spell slots. When you do, the more spells you prepare, the more spell levels you lose from your focus until you remove the external spells. For the highest level of external spell you have prepared beyond a small set of &quot;free&quot; slots, you lose that number of spell levels from your focus.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MuhVerisimilitude, post: 9328499, member: 7042567"] Each wizard should be more narrow. No more generalist wizards who are better than the specialists at their schtick. I picture wizards picking a main focus. This focus gives them access to spells of a [B]very[/B] narrow theme. For example teleportation. This wizard can now mainly do teleportation magic. If you want to extend beyond this you can, but preparing spells outside of your focus lowers the peak potential of your focus type spells. In short: You have a bunch of spell slots and they must all be from your focus, but you can optionally prepare spells not from your focus in "external" spell slots. When you do, the more spells you prepare, the more spell levels you lose from your focus until you remove the external spells. For the highest level of [I]external[/I] spell you have prepared beyond a small set of "free" slots, you lose that number of spell levels from your focus. [/QUOTE]

Verification