Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Voidmoji" data-source="post: 8961067" data-attributes="member: 6985287">As the biggest, most well known RPG by a long shot, it makes sense to me that D&D would have options that cater to people who either prefer simple options, or are new to RPGs in general. And, perhaps 4e could have used some of that in the core rules, rather than the Essentials. I am really not a fan of Essentials, but after seeing someone have fun with a Slayer in a game in which I was a player, it is hard for me to argue that Essentials had no use. From what I understand, there are a couple of classes that are pretty good at being solid, yet simple options, such as the Elementalist. I should go back and reread them.Rounding back to the original topic, the 4e-inspired game I am working on doesn't have such options fleshed out at the moment. I am not making it to publish (yet...), just for myself, and whomever else might be interested. I am not designing it to cater to a broad audience, or to beginners. And so I don't need to worry about such things.</blockquote>