Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="plisnithus8" data-source="post: 7218046" data-attributes="member: 6870553">Yes, 2 accounts, one on my phone and one on my laptop, started as a result of password issues. I didn't mean to be deceptive and try to not abuse it in any way. If there's a policy, let me know and I'll delete one. I replied from closest device, saw I had replied in a way that would make it weird and thought it would be easier to not have to explain it all.My reading is caster has to choose effect.My DM says it allows wearer to cast invisibility as a bonus action. In that case, 5e dispel magic definitely ends inisibility if that was what caster wanted. She said "stop it" so i I think she wanted flying to stop though.I figured it was there to prevent that. I'm not sure how to determine if it is the only reason it's there.Okay, just did some more research.<a href="http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/rules-answers-march-2016" target="_blank">http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/rules-answers-march-2016</a>I think the answer is here."Can you use dispel magic to dispel a magical effect like a vampire’s Charm ability? Dispel magic has a particular purpose: to break other spells. It has no effect on a vampire’s Charm ability or any other magical effect that isn’t a spell. It also does nothing to the properties of a magic item. It can, however, end a spell cast from a magic item or from another source. Spells—they’re what dispel magic is about. For example, if you cast dispel magic on a staff of power, the spell fails to disrupt the staff’s magical properties, but if the staff’s wielder casts hold monster from the staff, dispel magic can end that spell if cast on the target of hold monster."Since this armor allows knight to cast invisibility, invisibility ends.But, if the armor acted more like Tolkein's One Ring, turning the ring and wearer invisible without a spell being cast, the invisibility would not be ended by dispel magic.Sound right?</blockquote>

Verification