Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How would you wish WOTC to do Dark Sun
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Haldrik" data-source="post: 8052290" data-attributes="member: 6694221"><p>With regard to magic sources.</p><p></p><p>The Dark Sun cosmological setting MUST clarify what the "sources" mean. But this simplifies nothing! Sources are their own complex and conflictive D&D traditions.</p><p></p><p>In some sense, sources didnt exist in 2e. There was only a Wizard class with a Wizard spell list, and a Cleric "Priest" class with a Cleric spell list. The difference between Wizard and Cleric was mechanical and self-evident. Later, variant class options multiplied, and even accelerated, such as 3e prestige classes.</p><p></p><p>By the time of 4e, magic "sources" are mechanically minor. But they are powerful tools for organizing tropes and flavor. The sources include:</p><p></p><p>• Arcane</p><p>• Divine</p><p>• Primal</p><p>• Martial</p><p>• Psionic</p><p>• Shadow</p><p>• Elemental</p><p></p><p>These sources imply information. For example planar correspondences: such as Elemental to the Elemental planes, Shadow to Shadowfell, Primal to Material, Divine to Astral Sea, and so on. Psionic-versus-Martial suggested mind-versus-body, but a class like Monk blurred clear lines. Arcane remained resolutely uncooperative, vague, and tripping over every other source. It would have been easy to equate Arcane with the Feywild plane, but the designers seemed to intentionally sabotage such simple identification. While the implications were self-evident, they remained undeveloped. In the end, the 4e sources were mostly broad brush strokes to paint a setting or a character concept. Details that contradicted a source happened all the time.</p><p></p><p>In 5e, the words "Divine" and "Arcane" and "Psionic" exist, but they are devoid of systematic meanings. A class like Bard blurs all of them. Arguably they arent even "sources". So far "Psionic" only means a kind of innate spell that eschews a required material component − something like a metamagic feat. Arcane classes like Wizard, Warlock, and Sorcerer lack shared features. So Arcane means nothing mechanically or even narratively. Arcane Cleric and Divine Sorcerer make such words strictly arbitrary.</p><p></p><p>In the end, the socalled sources are a random ad-hoc spattering of clouds. People can see in these clouds whatever they want to see, depending on exposure to previous editions and on personal preference.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But Dark Sun must sort this out. Because each source comes with its own mechanical and narrative implications.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Haldrik, post: 8052290, member: 6694221"] With regard to magic sources. The Dark Sun cosmological setting MUST clarify what the "sources" mean. But this simplifies nothing! Sources are their own complex and conflictive D&D traditions. In some sense, sources didnt exist in 2e. There was only a Wizard class with a Wizard spell list, and a Cleric "Priest" class with a Cleric spell list. The difference between Wizard and Cleric was mechanical and self-evident. Later, variant class options multiplied, and even accelerated, such as 3e prestige classes. By the time of 4e, magic "sources" are mechanically minor. But they are powerful tools for organizing tropes and flavor. The sources include: • Arcane • Divine • Primal • Martial • Psionic • Shadow • Elemental These sources imply information. For example planar correspondences: such as Elemental to the Elemental planes, Shadow to Shadowfell, Primal to Material, Divine to Astral Sea, and so on. Psionic-versus-Martial suggested mind-versus-body, but a class like Monk blurred clear lines. Arcane remained resolutely uncooperative, vague, and tripping over every other source. It would have been easy to equate Arcane with the Feywild plane, but the designers seemed to intentionally sabotage such simple identification. While the implications were self-evident, they remained undeveloped. In the end, the 4e sources were mostly broad brush strokes to paint a setting or a character concept. Details that contradicted a source happened all the time. In 5e, the words "Divine" and "Arcane" and "Psionic" exist, but they are devoid of systematic meanings. A class like Bard blurs all of them. Arguably they arent even "sources". So far "Psionic" only means a kind of innate spell that eschews a required material component − something like a metamagic feat. Arcane classes like Wizard, Warlock, and Sorcerer lack shared features. So Arcane means nothing mechanically or even narratively. Arcane Cleric and Divine Sorcerer make such words strictly arbitrary. In the end, the socalled sources are a random ad-hoc spattering of clouds. People can see in these clouds whatever they want to see, depending on exposure to previous editions and on personal preference. But Dark Sun must sort this out. Because each source comes with its own mechanical and narrative implications. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How would you wish WOTC to do Dark Sun
Top