Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nikosandros" data-source="post: 6081746" data-attributes="member: 7993">This has been discussed back when the &quot;new&quot; racial rules came out, but AFAIK, not recently and I'm curious about what the community currently thinks about them.I'm also wondering if the devs have mentioned anything related to the races recently. For example, if they said that they are pleased with the current iteration or if it is something that they are not testing at the moment, because they are concentrating on something else.For what is worth, I strongly dislike the racial modifiers for humans. I don't think that they are balanced, but I must admit that the testing in my group was limited. However, my strong dislike is primarily from the standpoint of flavor. If racial modifiers are needed in the game (and I'm not completely sure about this) than, for example, dwarves must have a tangible bonus with constitution instead of being the only race that is on par with humans.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nikosandros, post: 6081746, member: 7993"] This has been discussed back when the "new" racial rules came out, but AFAIK, not recently and I'm curious about what the community currently thinks about them. I'm also wondering if the devs have mentioned anything related to the races recently. For example, if they said that they are pleased with the current iteration or if it is something that they are not testing at the moment, because they are concentrating on something else. For what is worth, I strongly dislike the racial modifiers for humans. I don't think that they are balanced, but I must admit that the testing in my group was limited. However, my strong dislike is primarily from the standpoint of flavor. If racial modifiers are needed in the game (and I'm not completely sure about this) than, for example, dwarves must have a tangible bonus with constitution instead of being the only race that is on par with humans. [/QUOTE]

Verification