Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Human racial abilty modifiers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 6081905" data-attributes="member: 6689464"><p>[Warning, pointless uselees childish arguing ahead]</p><p>I think your examples are biased, and most of those are actually consecuences of strength rather than the other stats. Actually if gender modifiers existed, women would be overpowered:</p><p></p><p>Strength: yes, the only one where males win, no arguing</p><p>Dexterity: many of your examples relly on strength, (shooting with a bow requires strength, so does shooting with a gun or rifle in order to counter the ricochet and it requires spatial coordination, something men's brains are better at). Actually, only because of smaller hands and bodies and lower center of gravity women are more agile and quicker.</p><p></p><p>Constitution: your marathon example is flawed, again it all comes to more strength. But if anything historically women have been longer lived despite having suffered from worse nutrition than men in many cases. Talk about endurance.</p><p></p><p>Int. this point is better left alone</p><p></p><p>Wis: Women have better peripheral vision on average, and are more perceptive and sensitive, not to mention are less susceptible to fits of rage, that sure warrants a wis bonus</p><p></p><p>Cha: this is also best left alone</p><p>[Back to totally serious posting]</p><p></p><p>But anyway that is silly, humans shouldn't have any racial/gender bonus at all (or have a bonus to any stat only, though that is already pushing it). That would only bring needless unfortunate chauvinistic and racist implications, no please no. Specially because HUMANS ARE THE BASELINE, if people were more receptive of racial penalties we wouldn't need to have this conversation in first place, bring back negative racial modiffiers, a PC with more than one low stat ought to be viable. (And yes I don't only strongly dislike the current human bonuses, I truly hate them)</p><p></p><p>And I find it quite sad that what little had remained cosntant about humans in 3e and 4e (bonus feat and skill) has been entirely thrown out the window (maybe allow to pick and extra ability to use skill dice in the basic game and an extra background in the standard game? with the option of an extra feat is specialties are in?). Understand that what they attempt is simple, but it feels entirely wrong, that is no human, that is a kryptonian, or a demigod, or a saiyan, or atlantean, or a metahuman, or whatever you fancy, but human? no, not by any measure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoonSong, post: 6081905, member: 6689464"] [Warning, pointless uselees childish arguing ahead] I think your examples are biased, and most of those are actually consecuences of strength rather than the other stats. Actually if gender modifiers existed, women would be overpowered: Strength: yes, the only one where males win, no arguing Dexterity: many of your examples relly on strength, (shooting with a bow requires strength, so does shooting with a gun or rifle in order to counter the ricochet and it requires spatial coordination, something men's brains are better at). Actually, only because of smaller hands and bodies and lower center of gravity women are more agile and quicker. Constitution: your marathon example is flawed, again it all comes to more strength. But if anything historically women have been longer lived despite having suffered from worse nutrition than men in many cases. Talk about endurance. Int. this point is better left alone Wis: Women have better peripheral vision on average, and are more perceptive and sensitive, not to mention are less susceptible to fits of rage, that sure warrants a wis bonus Cha: this is also best left alone [Back to totally serious posting] But anyway that is silly, humans shouldn't have any racial/gender bonus at all (or have a bonus to any stat only, though that is already pushing it). That would only bring needless unfortunate chauvinistic and racist implications, no please no. Specially because HUMANS ARE THE BASELINE, if people were more receptive of racial penalties we wouldn't need to have this conversation in first place, bring back negative racial modiffiers, a PC with more than one low stat ought to be viable. (And yes I don't only strongly dislike the current human bonuses, I truly hate them) And I find it quite sad that what little had remained cosntant about humans in 3e and 4e (bonus feat and skill) has been entirely thrown out the window (maybe allow to pick and extra ability to use skill dice in the basic game and an extra background in the standard game? with the option of an extra feat is specialties are in?). Understand that what they attempt is simple, but it feels entirely wrong, that is no human, that is a kryptonian, or a demigod, or a saiyan, or atlantean, or a metahuman, or whatever you fancy, but human? no, not by any measure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Human racial abilty modifiers
Top