Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Humanoids, and playing monstrous races
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 6114984" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p>You know this is not what the thread is about. If you do not see a qualitative difference between a player wanting to play a dragon and a player wanting to play an orc, then there is no conversation to be had. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All this is fine -- in fact, I think we're on the exact same page. </p><p></p><p>Kobolds -- weaker than any other pc race. Check. </p><p>Drow and Githynaki real threats and not a PC race. Check.</p><p>Bugbear "a 3HD monster" -- well, it's 4 dice in the current pack (18 hit points), but fine -- they are beefy. </p><p></p><p>I think you mean a lot more though by the phrase "3HD monster". 3.x had the level-adjustment mechanic, and had humanoid levels to beef up creatures. That's not what I am advocating. And if the Bugbear were written in a way that made if feel like it was some bigger creature, with more raw bulk, then that too would take it out of the category of race I'm considering. But it isn't.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, we're actually agreeing here. If the designers power-up these races so that they are incompatible with being played as a first-level PC, fine. That's a win. As they are, they have been powered-down (without this goal of making playable races in mind, evidently), so that all of the races being considered are underpowered compared to a level-1 PC. </p><p></p><p>In fact, I made only three suggestions for "powering up" the races:</p><p>-- making kobolds mildly tricksy </p><p>-- giving bugbears and gnolls a few hit points though the toughness feet</p><p>-- making some feats available to races that aren;t available universally. </p><p>All of these were kept separate from the actual descriptions. All of them were an attempt to make something distinctive about playing one of the races in question. </p><p></p><p>My claim is that none of these makes the races PC inappropriate. In fact, I'd claim none of them make the races equal to any other PC race we've been given. But they would be viable, if weaker.</p><p></p><p>I really don't think we're that far apart.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 6114984, member: 23484"] You know this is not what the thread is about. If you do not see a qualitative difference between a player wanting to play a dragon and a player wanting to play an orc, then there is no conversation to be had. All this is fine -- in fact, I think we're on the exact same page. Kobolds -- weaker than any other pc race. Check. Drow and Githynaki real threats and not a PC race. Check. Bugbear "a 3HD monster" -- well, it's 4 dice in the current pack (18 hit points), but fine -- they are beefy. I think you mean a lot more though by the phrase "3HD monster". 3.x had the level-adjustment mechanic, and had humanoid levels to beef up creatures. That's not what I am advocating. And if the Bugbear were written in a way that made if feel like it was some bigger creature, with more raw bulk, then that too would take it out of the category of race I'm considering. But it isn't. Again, we're actually agreeing here. If the designers power-up these races so that they are incompatible with being played as a first-level PC, fine. That's a win. As they are, they have been powered-down (without this goal of making playable races in mind, evidently), so that all of the races being considered are underpowered compared to a level-1 PC. In fact, I made only three suggestions for "powering up" the races: -- making kobolds mildly tricksy -- giving bugbears and gnolls a few hit points though the toughness feet -- making some feats available to races that aren;t available universally. All of these were kept separate from the actual descriptions. All of them were an attempt to make something distinctive about playing one of the races in question. My claim is that none of these makes the races PC inappropriate. In fact, I'd claim none of them make the races equal to any other PC race we've been given. But they would be viable, if weaker. I really don't think we're that far apart. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Humanoids, and playing monstrous races
Top