Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6167157" data-attributes="member: 1465">For me it's definitely better than the current +1 to all stats. It doesn't affect bare ability scores, thus humans won't be like now &quot;better than humans&quot;. Expertise can also be easily interpreted as either natural talent, experience/training, or a mix of both.I still prefer the other idea of granting humans one feat, but I also feel like expertise dice is what replaces skills right now in the Basic/Standard game, and might be worth roughly one feat. If this is true, then it will be perfect.Only possible worry, is whether it is fair to have PCs with expertise dice to three or more abilities. I am fine with 1, but 2 already is a bit of a stretch. 3 would mean your PC benefits from expertice dice bonuses on half of all checks... it is getting too much for my tastes, so perhaps some limitations to 2 overall might be more fair.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6167157, member: 1465"] For me it's definitely better than the current +1 to all stats. It doesn't affect bare ability scores, thus humans won't be like now "better than humans". Expertise can also be easily interpreted as either natural talent, experience/training, or a mix of both. I still prefer the other idea of granting humans one feat, but I also feel like expertise dice is what replaces skills right now in the Basic/Standard game, and might be worth roughly one feat. If this is true, then it will be perfect. Only possible worry, is whether it is fair to have PCs with expertise dice to [I]three[/I] or more abilities. I am fine with 1, but 2 already is a bit of a stretch. 3 would mean your PC benefits from expertice dice bonuses on [I]half [/I]of all checks... it is getting too much for my tastes, so perhaps some limitations to 2 overall might be more fair. [/QUOTE]

Verification