Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Humans are corruptible!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gunpowder" data-source="post: 3915955" data-attributes="member: 57702"><p>on subject</p><p>I do not think that corruption is describing race. The quote was just referring to the downside to human's versitilaty. That they tend to mess with things that they should not. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would disagree with your conclusion here.</p><p></p><p>1. the h-t marriage rate is doubling the tieflings population and is not at the replacement rate because the two tieflings are only growing the tiefling population the first one replaces the tiefling parent and the other simple adds to the population because the human parent is not calculated in for the tiefling population. </p><p>1a. At the same time the human parent that is with the tiefling is simply removed from the human population because he/she will not produce human offspring, it would be no different if that human had died in adolescence as far as population growth is concerned so you are also decreasing human fecundity/generation exponentially as well. </p><p></p><p>2. You are also assuming that there is enough resources to support the growing tiefling population. Perhaps in a human kingdom non-humans are not considered citizens and so are barred from many benefits and perks and thus the resources to provide for a mate and offspring are reduced making human partners much more appealing. </p><p>2a. You are also assuming that all offspring will produce offspring of their own and ignoring any difference in death rate for the two populations. Tieflings may have a higher death rate than humans due to reduced access to resources mentioned in point 2. </p><p></p><p>3. I am about to completely disagree with point 1a because fecundity is not calculated based on total population size but solely on the population of females because that is the limiting factor regarding fecundity. Human males can hook up with tieflings as much as they want and it would not affect the fecundity of the population as long as there are enough human males to marry all the females in the population. Granted female humans marrying tieflings will affect fecundity but we do not know what the majority of h-t matings are. </p><p></p><p>In conclusion, population ecology while interesting (I am an ecology major for a reason), it is also complicated and I would rather focus on killing things and taking their stuff then mess with calculating fitness rates. Also I think I misused the term fecundity a couple times, fitness is the term I should have used, consider the terms interchangeable</p><p></p><p>(aside I find it funny that my first post is discussing the fitness rates of tiefling and human populations.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gunpowder, post: 3915955, member: 57702"] on subject I do not think that corruption is describing race. The quote was just referring to the downside to human's versitilaty. That they tend to mess with things that they should not. I would disagree with your conclusion here. 1. the h-t marriage rate is doubling the tieflings population and is not at the replacement rate because the two tieflings are only growing the tiefling population the first one replaces the tiefling parent and the other simple adds to the population because the human parent is not calculated in for the tiefling population. 1a. At the same time the human parent that is with the tiefling is simply removed from the human population because he/she will not produce human offspring, it would be no different if that human had died in adolescence as far as population growth is concerned so you are also decreasing human fecundity/generation exponentially as well. 2. You are also assuming that there is enough resources to support the growing tiefling population. Perhaps in a human kingdom non-humans are not considered citizens and so are barred from many benefits and perks and thus the resources to provide for a mate and offspring are reduced making human partners much more appealing. 2a. You are also assuming that all offspring will produce offspring of their own and ignoring any difference in death rate for the two populations. Tieflings may have a higher death rate than humans due to reduced access to resources mentioned in point 2. 3. I am about to completely disagree with point 1a because fecundity is not calculated based on total population size but solely on the population of females because that is the limiting factor regarding fecundity. Human males can hook up with tieflings as much as they want and it would not affect the fecundity of the population as long as there are enough human males to marry all the females in the population. Granted female humans marrying tieflings will affect fecundity but we do not know what the majority of h-t matings are. In conclusion, population ecology while interesting (I am an ecology major for a reason), it is also complicated and I would rather focus on killing things and taking their stuff then mess with calculating fitness rates. Also I think I misused the term fecundity a couple times, fitness is the term I should have used, consider the terms interchangeable (aside I find it funny that my first post is discussing the fitness rates of tiefling and human populations.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Humans are corruptible!
Top