Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Akrasia" data-source="post: 2504827" data-attributes="member: 23012">It's a pretty radical break.  While it keeps certain 'core features' -- classes, levels, hit points, Tolkien-esque races, alignment -- it also includes a lot that breaks with previous versions of D&D.  Some of the most significant changes include: feats, skills (though simpler skill systems were in RC D&D and AD&D), easy multiclassing, more common magic items (and much easier crafting rules), completely different combat system (3e is much more tactical and detailed than ealier editions), a very different power scale (level advancement is much faster in 3e; also, in pre-3e versions of D&D, the power increases per level tapered off significantly after level ten or so, whereas they do not in 3e), prestige classes (though antecedents existed in 1e and RC D&D), and many other things.In my own view, D&D 3e is effectively a new game -- a new system with an old label.  My 'simple test' for this is that it is very difficult to convert pre-3e material into 3e rules (it requires a lot of work), whereas it is very easy to convert material between different versions of pre-3e D&D (e.g. 1e AD&D to 2e AD&D, or 1e AD&D to RC D&D).This is not a bad thing (despite the fact that people strangely freak out on these boards whenever I make this point).  Rather, my point is that the similarity between 3e D&D and pre-3e D&D is about as strong as the similarity between AD&D and Tunnels and Trolls or MERP.  Or, to put the point in another way, when I first read the 3e books I thought: "So, they revised D&D to be like Rolemaster!"  (Note: different people had different associations when reading 3e -- e.g. some people thought it obviously borrowed from Runequest, others GURPS, and so forth.  3e borrowed from many different games, but it was clearly a radical departure from pre-3e D&D.)Again, the fact that 3e is effectively a 'new game' IMO is not a bad thing, especially since there were many systems back before 3e that I preferred to AD&D (e.g. MERP, Rolemaster, Runequest, etc.), and some of my favourite features from those other systems were incorporated into 3e.   (Despite that, 3e is still not my favourite version of D&D -- I prefer the RC version, or C&C if it counts, but my own tastes are neither here nor there for the purposes of my point.)In short, the changes were pretty radical.   <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool    :cool:"  data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> As for Rasyr's question, It'll be interesting to see if the 3e diehards join the people who still play 1e and OD&D over at Dragonsfoot.org once WotC 'upgrades' to 4e.  Today's hip gamer is tomorrow's grognard.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification