Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Hypothetical Scenario: What if WotC chooses never to do 4E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Razz" data-source="post: 3665992" data-attributes="member: 3014"><p>We all know 4E is coming, whether some of us want it to or not (like me), but here's an interesting twist to all of this.</p><p></p><p>What if WotC stated they're never going to plan to do a 4E and we simply need to make the best of what we have and what we can tweak in 3.5E? But they want our help to do it and they'll do their best to make it happen?</p><p></p><p>Personally, I think something like this would be awesome since no one has to switch editions, people can expect their D&D to continue to expand and not hit the edge of a cliff once a new edition rolls around, and every generation of D&D gamers can enjoy the same game and not have to say to each other "I only know 2E and 3.0E, John knows 3.5E, my son knows only 3.5E and a little of 4E, Will and Diana know only 1E, and Joe only knows 4E..."</p><p></p><p>Now on a much more objective perspective, what would you as the customer and fan want WotC to do to make 3.5E more interesting and less complex yet please both the folks that want "rules light" and "rules heavy"? Obviously something like this means WotC really needs to get rolling on all their backed up errata, for one example. </p><p></p><p>Other than errata, what rules in 3.5E would you want WotC to modify (similar in scope to the "Polymorph" issues)? What parts of the 3.5E system would you want WotC to explore to make the game evolve and more fun without requiring a whole edition change (e.g. the <strong>Tome of Battle</strong>, <strong>Magic of Incarnum</strong>, and <strong>Tome of Magic</strong> books)? What sort of products would you want in an edition that "never ends"?</p><p></p><p>Another interesting question would be do you think D&D would dry out if 4E never came? Do you really think a game like D&D needs to roll up an entire new editon and set of rules in order to stay fresh and keep the fans wanting more? Or can they come to a happy medium in 3.5E? Will there ever be a "peak" to the D&D system rules or must there always be complete revisions of the system into a whole new edition? What is stopping the current edition from evolving in its current state? Is it our fault or WotC's?</p><p></p><p>Let's not all forget, the only reason 3E came was because D&D really needed a complete overhaul from what TSR did to it. That's the only reason D&D got such a transformation. What do you think would have to happen to 3.5E in order for 4E to be released? I think the same thing that happened to 2E would have to happen, but do you ever see 3.5E drowning in the same garbage 2E did to itself?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Razz, post: 3665992, member: 3014"] We all know 4E is coming, whether some of us want it to or not (like me), but here's an interesting twist to all of this. What if WotC stated they're never going to plan to do a 4E and we simply need to make the best of what we have and what we can tweak in 3.5E? But they want our help to do it and they'll do their best to make it happen? Personally, I think something like this would be awesome since no one has to switch editions, people can expect their D&D to continue to expand and not hit the edge of a cliff once a new edition rolls around, and every generation of D&D gamers can enjoy the same game and not have to say to each other "I only know 2E and 3.0E, John knows 3.5E, my son knows only 3.5E and a little of 4E, Will and Diana know only 1E, and Joe only knows 4E..." Now on a much more objective perspective, what would you as the customer and fan want WotC to do to make 3.5E more interesting and less complex yet please both the folks that want "rules light" and "rules heavy"? Obviously something like this means WotC really needs to get rolling on all their backed up errata, for one example. Other than errata, what rules in 3.5E would you want WotC to modify (similar in scope to the "Polymorph" issues)? What parts of the 3.5E system would you want WotC to explore to make the game evolve and more fun without requiring a whole edition change (e.g. the [B]Tome of Battle[/B], [B]Magic of Incarnum[/B], and [B]Tome of Magic[/B] books)? What sort of products would you want in an edition that "never ends"? Another interesting question would be do you think D&D would dry out if 4E never came? Do you really think a game like D&D needs to roll up an entire new editon and set of rules in order to stay fresh and keep the fans wanting more? Or can they come to a happy medium in 3.5E? Will there ever be a "peak" to the D&D system rules or must there always be complete revisions of the system into a whole new edition? What is stopping the current edition from evolving in its current state? Is it our fault or WotC's? Let's not all forget, the only reason 3E came was because D&D really needed a complete overhaul from what TSR did to it. That's the only reason D&D got such a transformation. What do you think would have to happen to 3.5E in order for 4E to be released? I think the same thing that happened to 2E would have to happen, but do you ever see 3.5E drowning in the same garbage 2E did to itself? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Hypothetical Scenario: What if WotC chooses never to do 4E?
Top