Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 9552755" data-attributes="member: 7034611">too many ‘you said’ here…you conflated two issues in your previous response, I said WotC could release it under the OGL if they wanted to, and I asked you for an example of why you think it is important to have it under the OGLYou turned that into ‘Repeatedly saying that a "case" needed to be made for releasing the 5.2 SRD under the OGL, only to then agree that no such case was necessary’ which very much does sound like I asked you for a case for WotC to release it, which I never asked for. I also never ‘then agreed’ that none is needed, I agreed that WotC could simply release it under CC and OGL from the very start.which is why I clarified that I wanted an example about 5 posts back, and the only thing you offered is ‘because potentially someone somewhere wants to use something from it in a product that already takes OGL stuff and then does not have to figure out how to mix two licenses’, which is about as weak as it gets, as far as cases go (and still is not an example)You keep misrepresenting stuff and I grow tired of having to correct it. Add to this that the discussion will go nowhere even if we did not have to continue going in circles in each reply, and I am not really interested in continuing this. So I bow out and hope I will not get dragged in again <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification