Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 9552761" data-attributes="member: 8461">No, I meant what I said you said you said. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue    :P"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />No conflation happened. You were the one who purported that I said that you said that WotC needed to make a case, to which you replied that you hadn't said that WotC needed to; I responded to that by saying that I didn't say that you said that WotC needed to, just that you had said that.Accurately recounting your previous posts is not "turned that into" anything. You asked for a "case," and I gave you one, which you then turned around and said wasn't a case, and when I pointed out that it not only in fact was but also that such a case wasn't relevant to the topic at hand, you agreed with me.Not from the very start, no. You only agreed with that point after I made it; hence why it's an "agreement" per se.You're self-evidently wrong about that being not an example, and even more wrong about it being weak. Quite the contrary, that goes to the very heart of the issue, and is so strong that you not only haven't been able to offer a counterpoint, but instead completely dropped your opposition and agreed with my central premise. Which makes this tangent that you're making now quite bizarre.I'm accurately representing everything you said; if you don't care for that, then there's nothing I can do, since you're the one who said it.I don't see how there's any "have to" about any of it, in all honesty, which is another instance of the language you're using not helping to clarify the point(s) in question.Nobody is "dragging you in" to anything; either reply or don't, at your discretion.</blockquote>

Verification