Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I don't actually get the opposition for the warlord... or rather the opposition to the concept.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaptainGemini" data-source="post: 6735209" data-attributes="member: 6801122"><p>Making the Warlord a subclass doesn't take away those builds if they handle it correctly. There's easily half a dozen builds with any subclass right now. You don't really need another full class for what amounts to a niche role.</p><p></p><p>And psionics... a series of subclasses for each class could solve that. Psychic warrior? Fighter subclass. Wilder? Sorcerer subclass. Psionicist? Wizard subclass. And so on. You could even come up with entirely new psionics options via this method while still keeping it to the current class system.</p><p></p><p>Plus, they really do need to flush out the main classes with a lot more subclasses before we're even close to those having enough attention.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What very clear need? I've seen these arguments a hundred times before, and they all amount to what people <em>want</em> without a true justification that it's actually <em>needed</em>.</p><p></p><p>Personally? I would love a psionics class... but I can't justify it. I can use the same arguments people use for a Warlord... and, at the end of the day, have never justified adding one at all.</p><p></p><p>No, there is no very clear need. The system they have in place eliminates most of the necessity, and careful balancing of new additions as subclasses will eliminate the rest.</p><p></p><p>And, before someone says anything about giving people what they want being a good idea: WotC has already learned from that mistake. Listening to people on forums is what produced 4E, and we all know how that edition turned out. So, yeah, if they're smart, they'll put forum topics like this right on their ignore list and continue listening to the surveys. Which it appears they have. And, hey, guess what surveys caused the lack of Warlord in 5E?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah. The really crazy 3.5 class bloat is in Pathfinder. Plus, 3.5 had a growing list of base classes long before it ended.</p><p></p><p>And if they do PrCs how I suspect they will, those will also be limited in number with not much room to grow.</p><p></p><p>Now, where do I think the bloat will happen? Subclasses. They've pretty much set 5E up for that being the bloat this time around. The slow production time just keeps it from happening quickly. And, I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing. If handled right and kept slow, subclass bloat could benefit the game heavily in the long run. After all, are you ever going to say no to more options for your character?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaptainGemini, post: 6735209, member: 6801122"] Making the Warlord a subclass doesn't take away those builds if they handle it correctly. There's easily half a dozen builds with any subclass right now. You don't really need another full class for what amounts to a niche role. And psionics... a series of subclasses for each class could solve that. Psychic warrior? Fighter subclass. Wilder? Sorcerer subclass. Psionicist? Wizard subclass. And so on. You could even come up with entirely new psionics options via this method while still keeping it to the current class system. Plus, they really do need to flush out the main classes with a lot more subclasses before we're even close to those having enough attention. What very clear need? I've seen these arguments a hundred times before, and they all amount to what people [I]want[/I] without a true justification that it's actually [I]needed[/I]. Personally? I would love a psionics class... but I can't justify it. I can use the same arguments people use for a Warlord... and, at the end of the day, have never justified adding one at all. No, there is no very clear need. The system they have in place eliminates most of the necessity, and careful balancing of new additions as subclasses will eliminate the rest. And, before someone says anything about giving people what they want being a good idea: WotC has already learned from that mistake. Listening to people on forums is what produced 4E, and we all know how that edition turned out. So, yeah, if they're smart, they'll put forum topics like this right on their ignore list and continue listening to the surveys. Which it appears they have. And, hey, guess what surveys caused the lack of Warlord in 5E? Nah. The really crazy 3.5 class bloat is in Pathfinder. Plus, 3.5 had a growing list of base classes long before it ended. And if they do PrCs how I suspect they will, those will also be limited in number with not much room to grow. Now, where do I think the bloat will happen? Subclasses. They've pretty much set 5E up for that being the bloat this time around. The slow production time just keeps it from happening quickly. And, I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing. If handled right and kept slow, subclass bloat could benefit the game heavily in the long run. After all, are you ever going to say no to more options for your character? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I don't actually get the opposition for the warlord... or rather the opposition to the concept.
Top