Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ChrisCarlson" data-source="post: 6736003" data-attributes="member: 6801216">Fair enough. Given the "extreme balance" with which 4e was designed, that's extremely telling in-and-of-itself.Not sure why that's relevant. We aren't talking about 3e. We are talking about a broken 4e class being desired in 5e.Thanksfully so. So why ruin that by breaking BA and the action economy?IMO, at-will action granting would be broken in 5e as well. As you just explained, BA and action economy is at work keeping things in check. Blowing it up leads to broken.What warlord? And what power are you referencing? That's just partially realized, stretch assumption of what the warlord (when-and-if it ever exists beyond what already does) could and would do. Especially if some of the more vociferous, zealous and adamant advocates here keep pushing their unyielding agenda for a Kitchen Sink class. I do not believe they would accept your proposed class feature as good enough.</blockquote>