Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I don't actually get the opposition for the warlord... or rather the opposition to the concept.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 6751142" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>"many people clearly want" is a fair statement. But it seems really obvious that "many people really oppose" is also just as fair. So keep that in context.</p><p>The question of "forcing" people to use something is valid. But only if we ignore the reality of what is being put out.</p><p>3E had TONs of crap that I ignored and disallowed. I never thought twice about it.</p><p>3E had TONs of great content as well.</p><p></p><p>Convince WotC to start putting out some wide ranging content and nobody who hates warlords will have the time or energy to care if you get one.</p><p>But in the vast void of new classes, if they suddenly focus on something that specifically caters to one group (and a playstyle they are clearly backtracking from overdoing) then that woudl send a pretty negative message to a lot of people.</p><p></p><p>So, again, the message is NOT "no warlord ever". It is "produce content that everyone can use by either avoiding niche topics for the precious little material coming out or cover a lot of ground really well"</p><p></p><p>Option 2 doesn't seem to be in the cards. So niche avoiding it is.</p><p>Put it to a vote. I will LOVE to ignore your warlord while drinking up all the other options produced. Convince WotC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 6751142, member: 957"] "many people clearly want" is a fair statement. But it seems really obvious that "many people really oppose" is also just as fair. So keep that in context. The question of "forcing" people to use something is valid. But only if we ignore the reality of what is being put out. 3E had TONs of crap that I ignored and disallowed. I never thought twice about it. 3E had TONs of great content as well. Convince WotC to start putting out some wide ranging content and nobody who hates warlords will have the time or energy to care if you get one. But in the vast void of new classes, if they suddenly focus on something that specifically caters to one group (and a playstyle they are clearly backtracking from overdoing) then that woudl send a pretty negative message to a lot of people. So, again, the message is NOT "no warlord ever". It is "produce content that everyone can use by either avoiding niche topics for the precious little material coming out or cover a lot of ground really well" Option 2 doesn't seem to be in the cards. So niche avoiding it is. Put it to a vote. I will LOVE to ignore your warlord while drinking up all the other options produced. Convince WotC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I don't actually get the opposition for the warlord... or rather the opposition to the concept.
Top