Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lord Twig" data-source="post: 6755536" data-attributes="member: 31754">I won't answer everything directly here. Some I address in my answer to Bawlie.I will point out that I like the idea of rituals from 4e. That was a good idea. Also the &quot;at will&quot; cantrips was incorporated into Pathfinder as well, and it's a good idea from either game.The longer short rest (an hour instead of 15 minutes) makes the &quot;encounter&quot; powers more acceptable. It feels like your characters are actually resting instead of just waiting for the cooldown to finish on their action bar. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :P"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />To get down to the bottom line. You want the Warlord allowed as the default, and I want it to be an optional class that would have to be explicitly allowed by the DM.Given the strong feelings this class evokes, I believe WotC should go the optional class route.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lord Twig, post: 6755536, member: 31754"] I won't answer everything directly here. Some I address in my answer to Bawlie. I will point out that I like the idea of rituals from 4e. That was a good idea. Also the "at will" cantrips was incorporated into Pathfinder as well, and it's a good idea from either game. The longer short rest (an hour instead of 15 minutes) makes the "encounter" powers more acceptable. It feels like your characters are actually resting instead of just waiting for the cooldown to finish on their action bar. :P To get down to the bottom line. You want the Warlord allowed as the default, and I want it to be an optional class that would have to be explicitly allowed by the DM. Given the strong feelings this class evokes, I believe WotC should go the optional class route. [/QUOTE]

Verification