Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9724548" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I mean, I think there's no possible way the culture of elves could be the same nearly-Ferengi human culture you're describing (i.e. the kind that concerns itself with "accruing assets"). Nor I think, given war, disease, monsters, revolutions, apocalypses and so on, would even elves actually be able to hold on to that wealth for hundreds and hundreds of years. Further, even in "elven enclaves" it seems like there's usually relatively little trade in non-perishable goods or resource exploitation (which would make sense).</p><p></p><p>It's like you're imagining immortal greedy 1800s-2000s humans time-travelling to the 1100s and carefully "accruing assets" like they were vampires planning to live forever.</p><p></p><p>I think most very long-lived beings probably couldn't live that way, wouldn't want to live that way, would rapidly come to see that such assets are worthless and ephemeral.</p><p></p><p>Also what connections? Most of their "connections" would be dead. Only other elves and similar, who are presumably pretty limited in number would be a thing - and the whole "all elves know each other" thing has been considered at length by fantasy. Plus just because you know someone, doesn't mean they like you or want to help you. The sort of feuds that could fester for centuries could be staggering.</p><p></p><p>Accumulated life learnings would be a thing, but again, it'd be complex because they'd have such a wealth of history that filtering signal from noise might be pretty challenging, and a lot of stuff that might have made sense 500 years ago might be outdated today. I think the main thing they'd learn would probably be to live for the now, not to dwell on the past which would lead to stagnation and wallowing, or to obsess about the future, which they'd know was ever in flux (and also tends to get you killed if you get too involved in it!).</p><p></p><p>I think what you're really pointing out here is that for super-long-lived beings they probably couldn't be very human-like past their first couple of hundred years.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a purely 20th century and later thing (or late 1800s at earliest, but even then the vast majority of people didn't live like that). It simply isn't how the world worked before that. Backprojecting it to elves in a quasi-medieval society or the like makes no sense. You're conceptualizing the world elves live in as if it's like, somewhere between the 1890s and the 1940s in the USA, it seems.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean, slaves existed. We know how much/little economic impact they had. You still have to feed/clothe/house them, especially if you like them. No married couple got rich off a single unskilled slave. There's a reason people trying to make money off slaves, whether in ancient Rome, or the US pre-Civil War South, usually needed to have quite a lot of them. Otherwise they're basically just cheaper servants, and overall exert an economic cost, rather than making you money (with rare exceptions like highly skilled slaves - but historically they tended to get paid themselves and sometimes quite well!).</p><p></p><p>You seem to be thinking this is capitalism and this would just be a nice little guy making gold coins appear in your pocket. Unlikely. Elves aren't Ferengi. People don't generally keep personally scrabbling for wealth when they don't need to (greedy billionaires aren't scrabbling, note - most of them are pretty lazy and it's just wealth begets wealth under modern free-market globalised capitalism - but fantasy settings generally aren't under free-market globalised capitalism, they're under pre-capitalistic situations). More likely long-lived elves quickly realize how futile and grim that is, and what really matters is living life.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9724548, member: 18"] I mean, I think there's no possible way the culture of elves could be the same nearly-Ferengi human culture you're describing (i.e. the kind that concerns itself with "accruing assets"). Nor I think, given war, disease, monsters, revolutions, apocalypses and so on, would even elves actually be able to hold on to that wealth for hundreds and hundreds of years. Further, even in "elven enclaves" it seems like there's usually relatively little trade in non-perishable goods or resource exploitation (which would make sense). It's like you're imagining immortal greedy 1800s-2000s humans time-travelling to the 1100s and carefully "accruing assets" like they were vampires planning to live forever. I think most very long-lived beings probably couldn't live that way, wouldn't want to live that way, would rapidly come to see that such assets are worthless and ephemeral. Also what connections? Most of their "connections" would be dead. Only other elves and similar, who are presumably pretty limited in number would be a thing - and the whole "all elves know each other" thing has been considered at length by fantasy. Plus just because you know someone, doesn't mean they like you or want to help you. The sort of feuds that could fester for centuries could be staggering. Accumulated life learnings would be a thing, but again, it'd be complex because they'd have such a wealth of history that filtering signal from noise might be pretty challenging, and a lot of stuff that might have made sense 500 years ago might be outdated today. I think the main thing they'd learn would probably be to live for the now, not to dwell on the past which would lead to stagnation and wallowing, or to obsess about the future, which they'd know was ever in flux (and also tends to get you killed if you get too involved in it!). I think what you're really pointing out here is that for super-long-lived beings they probably couldn't be very human-like past their first couple of hundred years. This is a purely 20th century and later thing (or late 1800s at earliest, but even then the vast majority of people didn't live like that). It simply isn't how the world worked before that. Backprojecting it to elves in a quasi-medieval society or the like makes no sense. You're conceptualizing the world elves live in as if it's like, somewhere between the 1890s and the 1940s in the USA, it seems. I mean, slaves existed. We know how much/little economic impact they had. You still have to feed/clothe/house them, especially if you like them. No married couple got rich off a single unskilled slave. There's a reason people trying to make money off slaves, whether in ancient Rome, or the US pre-Civil War South, usually needed to have quite a lot of them. Otherwise they're basically just cheaper servants, and overall exert an economic cost, rather than making you money (with rare exceptions like highly skilled slaves - but historically they tended to get paid themselves and sometimes quite well!). You seem to be thinking this is capitalism and this would just be a nice little guy making gold coins appear in your pocket. Unlikely. Elves aren't Ferengi. People don't generally keep personally scrabbling for wealth when they don't need to (greedy billionaires aren't scrabbling, note - most of them are pretty lazy and it's just wealth begets wealth under modern free-market globalised capitalism - but fantasy settings generally aren't under free-market globalised capitalism, they're under pre-capitalistic situations). More likely long-lived elves quickly realize how futile and grim that is, and what really matters is living life. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism
Top