Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I don't get the dislike of healing surges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5718775" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>OK</p><p></p><p></p><p>So far so good.</p><p></p><p>I can't say I would use these words. You are not a million miles off, but the spin here seems to be stuck in a mechanics first perspective. </p><p></p><p>Forget mechanics completely for a second. Now, what does your character do in situation X? Once that choice is made, now let the mechanics model that and establish an outcome, and a selecting from a range of the possible outcomes is part of that.</p><p></p><p>Now, of COURSE, a player (or character, if you will) is going to be informed on his choice by mechanics. A 10th level fighter will much more readily charge a hill giant than a 1st level fighter. And the mechanics, and the player's knowledge of them define why that is.</p><p></p><p>But that is no problem. Think about LotR. Aragorn knows he can kick an orc's ass. He knows he can probably hold off the Ring Wraiths for brief time. He knows the Cave Troll is a serious problem. And he knows that all he can do with the Balrog is carry hobbits, run like hell and hope Gandalf can buy enough time. And he knows that for each of those (with the possible exception of the Balrag) that luck can make things go better or worse that he expected, possibly dramatically so. When I read the books or watch the movies, I see all of that as understood knowledge. And it has nothing to do with mechanics. It is just an understanding of the narrative definitions of those various entities. </p><p></p><p>And a player running a 10th level fighter doesn't need to think 10th level to simply think "bad ass guy who can charge a hill giant, even though that hill giant could take out a team of 25 commoners". The mechanics PURELY come later as a reliable, consistent model for backing up that narrative definition.</p><p></p><p>Edit: I'd certainly loathe the idea of Aragorn's actions and results being defined not by a quality story but instead by concerns over how Frodo felt about the pacing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I'm not really feeling the whole "mechanics require" me to "step out of my role". I can do whatever the hell I want. The mechanics can not EVER REQUIRE anything. GOOD mechanics may prohibit things.</p><p></p><p>I think it can be said simply.</p><p></p><p>Anything that would make me declare a novel completely stupid and stop reading needs to be avoided.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Conan never receiving any wound that he couldn't make never require any further attention just by wishing it so would be on a list of things that would make me move on to something better to read.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5718775, member: 957"] OK So far so good. I can't say I would use these words. You are not a million miles off, but the spin here seems to be stuck in a mechanics first perspective. Forget mechanics completely for a second. Now, what does your character do in situation X? Once that choice is made, now let the mechanics model that and establish an outcome, and a selecting from a range of the possible outcomes is part of that. Now, of COURSE, a player (or character, if you will) is going to be informed on his choice by mechanics. A 10th level fighter will much more readily charge a hill giant than a 1st level fighter. And the mechanics, and the player's knowledge of them define why that is. But that is no problem. Think about LotR. Aragorn knows he can kick an orc's ass. He knows he can probably hold off the Ring Wraiths for brief time. He knows the Cave Troll is a serious problem. And he knows that all he can do with the Balrog is carry hobbits, run like hell and hope Gandalf can buy enough time. And he knows that for each of those (with the possible exception of the Balrag) that luck can make things go better or worse that he expected, possibly dramatically so. When I read the books or watch the movies, I see all of that as understood knowledge. And it has nothing to do with mechanics. It is just an understanding of the narrative definitions of those various entities. And a player running a 10th level fighter doesn't need to think 10th level to simply think "bad ass guy who can charge a hill giant, even though that hill giant could take out a team of 25 commoners". The mechanics PURELY come later as a reliable, consistent model for backing up that narrative definition. Edit: I'd certainly loathe the idea of Aragorn's actions and results being defined not by a quality story but instead by concerns over how Frodo felt about the pacing. Again, I'm not really feeling the whole "mechanics require" me to "step out of my role". I can do whatever the hell I want. The mechanics can not EVER REQUIRE anything. GOOD mechanics may prohibit things. I think it can be said simply. Anything that would make me declare a novel completely stupid and stop reading needs to be avoided. Conan never receiving any wound that he couldn't make never require any further attention just by wishing it so would be on a list of things that would make me move on to something better to read. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I don't get the dislike of healing surges
Top