Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 5724929" data-attributes="member: 42582">As long as we also acknowledge that 3E has certain issues - terminally - for my style, and that the players who have come to my 4e game having played only 3E, and not having experienced my Rolemaster game, have discovered more.I'm not really sure what you're trying to prove here.Here are some <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/299440-exploration-scenarios-my-experiment-last-sunday.html" target="_blank">actual</a> <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-discussion/309950-actual-play-my-first-social-only-session.html" target="_blank">play</a> <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-discussion/312367-actual-play-another-combat-free-session-intra-party-dyanmics.html" target="_blank">reports</a> of my by-the-book 4e campaign. Please show me where the WoW-ish shallowness, or the "fantasy board game with a dash of RPG", is to be found. I missed it while I was GMing those sessions.To put it another way. I've got nothing against you enjoying the BryonD 3E experience. I get a bit frustrated with these ongoing assertions and implications that no one else's game using a different system was ever as deep or compelling.</blockquote>