Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I don't like Dragonborn: Please come and bring friends.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OmegaMan950" data-source="post: 5918058" data-attributes="member: 49115"><p>I like dragonborn, I'm ok with half-orcs (prefer the 4E origin backstory to previous editions having them be a product of orc raids), and I've had a player always begging to play a minotaur since the 2E humanoids book came out. Didn't matter what campaign or style of play, always came with a minotaur statted up and ready to roll. Monsters as PCs has always been a thing but it's only now we are seeing them being really balanced against other race options, and this is a step in the right direction. If that means monster PCs being in the PHB then I'm all for it.</p><p></p><p>4E monsters as PCs were only bad to begin with, the options in the back of the MM1 were to give those players who wanted gnomes as PC the option to do so without having to wait for the PHB2. The options were aimed at statting up NPCS, but were acceptable enough for players. Problems like large weapons and overpowered racial powers were quickly altered (Should have been looked at off the bat, I hate errata and updates but it's necessary)</p><p></p><p>Savage Species was poor, the whole LA and ECL thing was kludgy and terrible, and monster characters were disproportionately powered compared to LA +0 PCs of the same level. The 2E Humanoid handbook was a mixed bag - I was in favour of class restrictions then, not now so it's all in retrospect - but most monsters were limited to fighters, thieves, and some cleric/shaman options. Not many could make it into the double digit levels unless they were a fighter or had awesome stats in their prime ability which was almost always boosted by the racial bonuses. Some people were ok with this, my group ignored racial level restrictions</p><p></p><p>This is why I'd prefer to see monster PCs in the PHB, because only then will they get the benefit of balance and fair play in respect to other "normal" races instead of just being tacked on at a later date. Players who want monster PCs have always been with us, and they aren't going away anytime soon</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OmegaMan950, post: 5918058, member: 49115"] I like dragonborn, I'm ok with half-orcs (prefer the 4E origin backstory to previous editions having them be a product of orc raids), and I've had a player always begging to play a minotaur since the 2E humanoids book came out. Didn't matter what campaign or style of play, always came with a minotaur statted up and ready to roll. Monsters as PCs has always been a thing but it's only now we are seeing them being really balanced against other race options, and this is a step in the right direction. If that means monster PCs being in the PHB then I'm all for it. 4E monsters as PCs were only bad to begin with, the options in the back of the MM1 were to give those players who wanted gnomes as PC the option to do so without having to wait for the PHB2. The options were aimed at statting up NPCS, but were acceptable enough for players. Problems like large weapons and overpowered racial powers were quickly altered (Should have been looked at off the bat, I hate errata and updates but it's necessary) Savage Species was poor, the whole LA and ECL thing was kludgy and terrible, and monster characters were disproportionately powered compared to LA +0 PCs of the same level. The 2E Humanoid handbook was a mixed bag - I was in favour of class restrictions then, not now so it's all in retrospect - but most monsters were limited to fighters, thieves, and some cleric/shaman options. Not many could make it into the double digit levels unless they were a fighter or had awesome stats in their prime ability which was almost always boosted by the racial bonuses. Some people were ok with this, my group ignored racial level restrictions This is why I'd prefer to see monster PCs in the PHB, because only then will they get the benefit of balance and fair play in respect to other "normal" races instead of just being tacked on at a later date. Players who want monster PCs have always been with us, and they aren't going away anytime soon [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I don't like Dragonborn: Please come and bring friends.
Top