Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I don't think Wizards is looking at the whole picture.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6766586" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>The response rate for surveys is usually pretty low. 50% is usually good. WotC has said the surveys were much, much higher. So there was a range of players. </p><p></p><p></p><p>But what percentage of AL are brand new? </p><p>AL is good for new players, but it's also good for players of all amounts of experience. The percentage of new players is likely higher in AL, but a majority are likely somewhat experienced. And players are only "new" for a short period. The people who started playing AL at the start have been playing for a year now, and it will likely be another year before the next non-adventure is released. (And a brand new setting would take a couple years to plan and write, so how many new people would be playing AL in three years?)</p><p></p><p>That point aside, this doesn't strike me as the best idea.</p><p>First, it's changing the rules of AL in mid-campaign. You need to work in world conversions. People will want to continue playing their character, and many will play every other month. There will be a mix of characters. </p><p>Second, it's also adding another layer of complexity to getting into the game, adding learning a setting onto learning the rules. </p><p>Third, it's hard on the writers. The AL needs to write and plan far in advance, and they'd need to learn a whole new setting, possibly while still in flux. They'd have to throw all their storylines out the window or end them quickly. </p><p></p><p>AL strikes me as a campaign that needs to exclusively stick to the Realms, regardless of where the storylines are set. </p><p></p><p></p><p>But why reprint then when they can just direct people to an already published PDF? </p><p>Unless they're doing a full rewrite its easier to just do a 10-30 page campaign conversion document (like the Eberron one), albeit one quickly playtested and revised. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Depends on the alternative. Official is nice if done well. That's the big caveat. </p><p>I think most Ravenloft fans were happier with fan conversions than Expedition to Castle Ravenloft. I think a lot of FR fans would have been happier with a fan conversion to the 4e ruleset than what actually happened. Many Ravenloft and Dragonlance fans were pretty darn happy with the licenced 3e products, which were only quasi-official. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm willing to put time into a fan conversion during my breaks, my lunch, and free moments at work. I'm willing to work on the project during my evenings. On the weekend. I can certainly leverage more hours to a conversion than someone working in a business who needs to attend meetings and give reports.</p><p>That's also just on a one-to-one basis. I can coordinate with dozens of fans to edit and give feedback (or add more content) via a Google docs. A dozen fans can output and convert a heck of a lot more information than the three or four writers WotC has on staff. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not entirely sure settings really ever sold that well. They sold well enough for TSR, but they were quite happy fragmenting their audience and competing with themselves and their licenced products. And they almost certainly never sold as well as WotC expected D&D books to sell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6766586, member: 37579"] The response rate for surveys is usually pretty low. 50% is usually good. WotC has said the surveys were much, much higher. So there was a range of players. But what percentage of AL are brand new? AL is good for new players, but it's also good for players of all amounts of experience. The percentage of new players is likely higher in AL, but a majority are likely somewhat experienced. And players are only "new" for a short period. The people who started playing AL at the start have been playing for a year now, and it will likely be another year before the next non-adventure is released. (And a brand new setting would take a couple years to plan and write, so how many new people would be playing AL in three years?) That point aside, this doesn't strike me as the best idea. First, it's changing the rules of AL in mid-campaign. You need to work in world conversions. People will want to continue playing their character, and many will play every other month. There will be a mix of characters. Second, it's also adding another layer of complexity to getting into the game, adding learning a setting onto learning the rules. Third, it's hard on the writers. The AL needs to write and plan far in advance, and they'd need to learn a whole new setting, possibly while still in flux. They'd have to throw all their storylines out the window or end them quickly. AL strikes me as a campaign that needs to exclusively stick to the Realms, regardless of where the storylines are set. But why reprint then when they can just direct people to an already published PDF? Unless they're doing a full rewrite its easier to just do a 10-30 page campaign conversion document (like the Eberron one), albeit one quickly playtested and revised. Depends on the alternative. Official is nice if done well. That's the big caveat. I think most Ravenloft fans were happier with fan conversions than Expedition to Castle Ravenloft. I think a lot of FR fans would have been happier with a fan conversion to the 4e ruleset than what actually happened. Many Ravenloft and Dragonlance fans were pretty darn happy with the licenced 3e products, which were only quasi-official. I'm willing to put time into a fan conversion during my breaks, my lunch, and free moments at work. I'm willing to work on the project during my evenings. On the weekend. I can certainly leverage more hours to a conversion than someone working in a business who needs to attend meetings and give reports. That's also just on a one-to-one basis. I can coordinate with dozens of fans to edit and give feedback (or add more content) via a Google docs. A dozen fans can output and convert a heck of a lot more information than the three or four writers WotC has on staff. I'm not entirely sure settings really ever sold that well. They sold well enough for TSR, but they were quite happy fragmenting their audience and competing with themselves and their licenced products. And they almost certainly never sold as well as WotC expected D&D books to sell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I don't think Wizards is looking at the whole picture.
Top