Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility""""
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rainynights" data-source="post: 9650406" data-attributes="member: 7040071"><p>As far as subclasses, most of the people wanting to use old subclasses in 2024 are gonna be people who already have a character built who was using that subclass and just don't want to remake the character from scratch again, so the old subclasses remaining "compatible" with the adjustment of shifting all their features before 3rd level onto 3rd level is nice to have (especially because most established builds are going to be past 3rd level anyway so they won't notice the change, rip to anyone that wants to keep their 1st level subclass from 2014 and only just started before the rules change if it wasnt one of the updated ones though). As for campaigns, honestly there wasn't really anything they needed to do to maintain backwards compatibility in those besides a sidebar saying, "use the 2024 version of the monster where available", explaining the monster to npc change and giving some advice on adapting old monsters that didn't make the cut at all in the 2024 book. They could have kept a lot of the weirder and more experimental rules and been fine as long as they didn't alter classes too much. Tbh we might even see the cut class changes come back in a supplement similar to tasha's alternate class features once wotc has finished porting over all the subclasses they want to.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rainynights, post: 9650406, member: 7040071"] As far as subclasses, most of the people wanting to use old subclasses in 2024 are gonna be people who already have a character built who was using that subclass and just don't want to remake the character from scratch again, so the old subclasses remaining "compatible" with the adjustment of shifting all their features before 3rd level onto 3rd level is nice to have (especially because most established builds are going to be past 3rd level anyway so they won't notice the change, rip to anyone that wants to keep their 1st level subclass from 2014 and only just started before the rules change if it wasnt one of the updated ones though). As for campaigns, honestly there wasn't really anything they needed to do to maintain backwards compatibility in those besides a sidebar saying, "use the 2024 version of the monster where available", explaining the monster to npc change and giving some advice on adapting old monsters that didn't make the cut at all in the 2024 book. They could have kept a lot of the weirder and more experimental rules and been fine as long as they didn't alter classes too much. Tbh we might even see the cut class changes come back in a supplement similar to tasha's alternate class features once wotc has finished porting over all the subclasses they want to. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility""""
Top