Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="reapersaurus" data-source="post: 1320463" data-attributes="member: 1194">This is one of the easier-disproved posts I've seen (as far as an fallacious opinion can be disproved):no redeeming qualities? Kate Beckinsale's posterior.DISPROVED.No original ideas?Werewolves and vampires descend from a common ancestor, and their bloodlines are due to a virus, that when combined creates another race. Not to mention that it's a werewolf vs vampire war movie, which to the best of my understanding has not been done the same way before at all.DISPROVED.No comedy - it WASN'T a comedy. duh.No action - did you WATCH the movie? Most people that comment talk about how it had too many action pieces.DISPROVED.Everything was done poorly - while this is VERY subjective, I'd have to put Viktor's revival up there with something that unequivocably was done very well.Anyway, everyone's entitled to their opinion, of course, but when their opinion is so devoid of any factual basis, it's hard to respect it.I think it shows poor form to start a thread about Underworld that basically says "it sucked", with no valid listing or reasoning that it sucked other than Craven's actor's performance.This kind of baseless criticism easily could have been added to the end of one of the various Underworld movie threads we've had. - it's hardly worthy of starting a new thread.</blockquote>