Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
I finally watched Underworld
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Serge" data-source="post: 1320635" data-attributes="member: 4049"><p><strong>Lame</strong></p><p></p><p>I was among those eagerly anticipating <em>Underworld</em>, a flick starring Kate Beckinsale and released by Screen Gems. Afterall, for those into comics, fantasy, sci-fi and similar fare, what could be better than a show down between two of gothic horror's greatest iconic monsters: Vampires and Werewolves? Of course, anyone who paid attention to the trailers, previews, and commercials would have known that a new direction was being taken with both creatures. It was obvious that two recent fantasy/sci-fi films, <em>Blade</em> and <em>The Matrix</em>, signficantly influenced <em>Underworld</em>. We had a gun-toting, leather wearing, martial arts film with blue-grey cinematography and a neo-gothic cityscape. With such a look, and an attractive star, and great previews, all that was needed was a good story and decent acting.</p><p></p><p>Well, half of something is better than nothing, I suppose...</p><p></p><p><em>Underworld</em> is an example of a film that captures some elements so well that it goes overboard in other elements and ultimately fails to accomplish its goals. UW is not a bad movie... but niether is it a good movie by any stretch of the imagination.</p><p></p><p>The concept of this story is there has been a war brewing between two castes of immortals for centuries: Vampires and Lycans (werewolves). No one knows how the war started and, over the past few centuries, Vampires have had the upper hand since the death of a major Lycan leader, Lucien. Selene (Beckinsale), our protagonist, is a Death-Dealer, a Vampire who kills Lycans. As such, she goes everywhere in leather oufits, wears a leather trench, wears high heels, and carries a pair of matching guns. Oh-la-la. Of course, she carries silver bullets. Everyone has cool gothic names (Victor, Selene, Lucien, Craven), which clearly indicates that these are cool characters. In the course of a botched attack on a couple of Lycans, Selene stumbles into a mystery concerning a mortal targetted by the Lycans: Michael. Thus begins a story that ideally would revolve around why Michael's important to the Lycans. Instead, what happens is an attempt to create an epic-style story over the course of 115 minutes and here the film fails miserably.</p><p></p><p>There are a number of flaws in the film. First, the power-relationships between Vampires and Lycans. Vampires really got the shaft here. Sure, they're stronger than mortals, but they're no stronger than a Lycan while the latter's in human form and certainly no match for a werewolf physically. Hell, half the time when the two meet, the Vampire stands around, hissing and spitting like a rabid cat, while the Lycan transforms and then rips the Vampire to shreds. What's confusing about this is that there are a few Vampires (the omnipresent Elders that we find in <em>every</em> modern Vampire story or game) who can take out a Werewolf effortlessly regardless of form... Oh, wait, I'm wrong; apparently only one Elder can do this. Which begs the question, why are the vamps winning? Well, because there are more of them. Which leads to other problems once you learn about the backgrounds of both groups. Powers fluctuate and some of the actions taken make no sense (like, we find out that Vampires can jump really high and stick to ceilings... but then they take the elevator or the stairs to get around). These inconsistencies were bothersome.</p><p></p><p>Another flaw is the breadth of the story. We are introduced to a lot of information in a short period of time. There are some interesting turns regarding motivations and goals, but these happen throughout the film at the worse times, introducing characters who end up being important but would have been better off in a sequel. It's clear that the writer(s) have a great background story here and I was intrigued by that story, but too much was introduced too soon and it diluted the characters. By the time I began to become interested in one character, another one was introduced who changed everything. This became a distraction and a bad one at that.</p><p></p><p>And then the obligatory love connection. An utter waste of time. In a trilogy, Selene and Michael would have been cool getting together. Instead, they just are horny for each other for no good reason and the film is cold as a result. There are other tensions that just make no sense, but it's this one that really annoys.</p><p></p><p>Finally, the fight scenes are uninspired. Towards the end of the film there's a fight between an Elder and another monster and it looks ridiculous. It's obvious that punches aren't connecting. In fact, in the theatre I watched the film, people laughed throughout that fight. Pair that with the Vampires kindly giving Werewolves time to transform, and it's enough to freeze the brain. Everyone carries a gun. And herein lies a final problem.</p><p></p><p>For whatever reason (actually, I have some suspicions), recent Vampire-type movies seem to frown upon the idea that these beings are supernatural creatures. Since <em>Blade</em>, the likes of Vampires have become increasingly "human." They don't fly, they don't change into anything, they don't control minds, they cast shadows and reflections, they don't move with preternatural speed, and they're not outrageously strong. I suppose this is a nod to contemporary sensibilities. Whatever. Afterall, if the audience can accept immortal creatures that drink blood and can be killed by sunlight, why can't they accept these other elements. In this film, which really boils down to an issue of classism and racism, it's all too human and robs Vampires and Werewolves of their supernatural overtones, the things that make them so cool. I'm all for revamping (no pun intended), but not at the expense of many of the core elements to a character-type. </p><p></p><p>Still, <em>Underworld</em> is not an utter failure. It does have some shining moments, and these come from the story <em>if</em> you're willing to accept that too much information is given away in one film rather than in two. This would have done better as a maxi-series on Sci-Fi channel because it would have been far more enjoyable and sensible. The look is slick and imposing and some of the effects (particularly the Lycans) are really cool. Beckinsale is not bad, and most of the acting, while not spectacular (aside from the Lycan leader, who's great!), is serviceable. </p><p></p><p>This is a renter, but not a keeper unless you just like to by DVDs (like me). <em>Underworld</em> is like a person with a great body covered in too much fat. We all know too much of something can be detrimental. This movie solidifies that notion.</p><p></p><p>C-</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Serge, post: 1320635, member: 4049"] [b]Lame[/b] I was among those eagerly anticipating [i]Underworld[/i], a flick starring Kate Beckinsale and released by Screen Gems. Afterall, for those into comics, fantasy, sci-fi and similar fare, what could be better than a show down between two of gothic horror's greatest iconic monsters: Vampires and Werewolves? Of course, anyone who paid attention to the trailers, previews, and commercials would have known that a new direction was being taken with both creatures. It was obvious that two recent fantasy/sci-fi films, [i]Blade[/i] and [i]The Matrix[/i], signficantly influenced [i]Underworld[/i]. We had a gun-toting, leather wearing, martial arts film with blue-grey cinematography and a neo-gothic cityscape. With such a look, and an attractive star, and great previews, all that was needed was a good story and decent acting. Well, half of something is better than nothing, I suppose... [i]Underworld[/i] is an example of a film that captures some elements so well that it goes overboard in other elements and ultimately fails to accomplish its goals. UW is not a bad movie... but niether is it a good movie by any stretch of the imagination. The concept of this story is there has been a war brewing between two castes of immortals for centuries: Vampires and Lycans (werewolves). No one knows how the war started and, over the past few centuries, Vampires have had the upper hand since the death of a major Lycan leader, Lucien. Selene (Beckinsale), our protagonist, is a Death-Dealer, a Vampire who kills Lycans. As such, she goes everywhere in leather oufits, wears a leather trench, wears high heels, and carries a pair of matching guns. Oh-la-la. Of course, she carries silver bullets. Everyone has cool gothic names (Victor, Selene, Lucien, Craven), which clearly indicates that these are cool characters. In the course of a botched attack on a couple of Lycans, Selene stumbles into a mystery concerning a mortal targetted by the Lycans: Michael. Thus begins a story that ideally would revolve around why Michael's important to the Lycans. Instead, what happens is an attempt to create an epic-style story over the course of 115 minutes and here the film fails miserably. There are a number of flaws in the film. First, the power-relationships between Vampires and Lycans. Vampires really got the shaft here. Sure, they're stronger than mortals, but they're no stronger than a Lycan while the latter's in human form and certainly no match for a werewolf physically. Hell, half the time when the two meet, the Vampire stands around, hissing and spitting like a rabid cat, while the Lycan transforms and then rips the Vampire to shreds. What's confusing about this is that there are a few Vampires (the omnipresent Elders that we find in [i]every[/i] modern Vampire story or game) who can take out a Werewolf effortlessly regardless of form... Oh, wait, I'm wrong; apparently only one Elder can do this. Which begs the question, why are the vamps winning? Well, because there are more of them. Which leads to other problems once you learn about the backgrounds of both groups. Powers fluctuate and some of the actions taken make no sense (like, we find out that Vampires can jump really high and stick to ceilings... but then they take the elevator or the stairs to get around). These inconsistencies were bothersome. Another flaw is the breadth of the story. We are introduced to a lot of information in a short period of time. There are some interesting turns regarding motivations and goals, but these happen throughout the film at the worse times, introducing characters who end up being important but would have been better off in a sequel. It's clear that the writer(s) have a great background story here and I was intrigued by that story, but too much was introduced too soon and it diluted the characters. By the time I began to become interested in one character, another one was introduced who changed everything. This became a distraction and a bad one at that. And then the obligatory love connection. An utter waste of time. In a trilogy, Selene and Michael would have been cool getting together. Instead, they just are horny for each other for no good reason and the film is cold as a result. There are other tensions that just make no sense, but it's this one that really annoys. Finally, the fight scenes are uninspired. Towards the end of the film there's a fight between an Elder and another monster and it looks ridiculous. It's obvious that punches aren't connecting. In fact, in the theatre I watched the film, people laughed throughout that fight. Pair that with the Vampires kindly giving Werewolves time to transform, and it's enough to freeze the brain. Everyone carries a gun. And herein lies a final problem. For whatever reason (actually, I have some suspicions), recent Vampire-type movies seem to frown upon the idea that these beings are supernatural creatures. Since [i]Blade[/i], the likes of Vampires have become increasingly "human." They don't fly, they don't change into anything, they don't control minds, they cast shadows and reflections, they don't move with preternatural speed, and they're not outrageously strong. I suppose this is a nod to contemporary sensibilities. Whatever. Afterall, if the audience can accept immortal creatures that drink blood and can be killed by sunlight, why can't they accept these other elements. In this film, which really boils down to an issue of classism and racism, it's all too human and robs Vampires and Werewolves of their supernatural overtones, the things that make them so cool. I'm all for revamping (no pun intended), but not at the expense of many of the core elements to a character-type. Still, [i]Underworld[/i] is not an utter failure. It does have some shining moments, and these come from the story [i]if[/i] you're willing to accept that too much information is given away in one film rather than in two. This would have done better as a maxi-series on Sci-Fi channel because it would have been far more enjoyable and sensible. The look is slick and imposing and some of the effects (particularly the Lycans) are really cool. Beckinsale is not bad, and most of the acting, while not spectacular (aside from the Lycan leader, who's great!), is serviceable. This is a renter, but not a keeper unless you just like to by DVDs (like me). [i]Underworld[/i] is like a person with a great body covered in too much fat. We all know too much of something can be detrimental. This movie solidifies that notion. C- [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
I finally watched Underworld
Top