Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I for one hope we don't get "clarification" on many things.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6374917" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>Nope, didn't say anything about lying, but biases (especially those that are negative towards a certain edition) could definitely influence one to present rules explanations in a more negative light than those of someone with no biases or even a positive view of the new edition. Do you disagree?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wait so a person being hidden and stepping into the view of someone else (thus making them capable of seeing them) but that not being an auto-end of their ability to be hidden ... is not relevant to a discussion about whether one can stay hidden while being able to be seen... What??? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /></p><p>I'm not even sure what to say at this point...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why not? If a bunch of your Party members attack him at that moment he very well could be. Now if your answer is to create a situation where having one's cover taken away automatically reveals you, I never said it couldn't be an outcome of being able to be seen... only that it's not the only outcome and thus not a blanket rule and I've already given quotes from the rules that back up my position... </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What was the lighting? If it's dim you would still need to make a perception check with disadvantage to see someone who is hidden... Is he wearing camouflage, a DM might rule that's enough for him to stay hidden... What you've done is stated one particular aspect of the situation (unless we're talking about a small brightly lit room with a single wall between the NPC and PC with all participants wearing bright colors)... not all the factors that go into whether he can or can't stay hidden... </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I thought you said the reference to distraction was irrelevant? Again what about lighting? Efforts taken to blend into the surroundings beforehand and so on... there are numerous reasons the rules or a DM could rule that you stay hidden... thus it is not a blanket rule...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope, but point me to the posts and I might tell you if I think their biases are perhaps influencing how they are "interpreting" the rules in the book (also total cover does not grant the ability to hide, you realize you could have total cover behind something that is totally transparent, right?)... of course from reading the above it seems that you have now switched gears and went back to talking about the conditions necessary to take the hide action (and you don't mention anything about staying hidden), so which one are we talking about?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 6374917, member: 48965"] Nope, didn't say anything about lying, but biases (especially those that are negative towards a certain edition) could definitely influence one to present rules explanations in a more negative light than those of someone with no biases or even a positive view of the new edition. Do you disagree? Wait so a person being hidden and stepping into the view of someone else (thus making them capable of seeing them) but that not being an auto-end of their ability to be hidden ... is not relevant to a discussion about whether one can stay hidden while being able to be seen... What??? :confused::confused: I'm not even sure what to say at this point... Why not? If a bunch of your Party members attack him at that moment he very well could be. Now if your answer is to create a situation where having one's cover taken away automatically reveals you, I never said it couldn't be an outcome of being able to be seen... only that it's not the only outcome and thus not a blanket rule and I've already given quotes from the rules that back up my position... What was the lighting? If it's dim you would still need to make a perception check with disadvantage to see someone who is hidden... Is he wearing camouflage, a DM might rule that's enough for him to stay hidden... What you've done is stated one particular aspect of the situation (unless we're talking about a small brightly lit room with a single wall between the NPC and PC with all participants wearing bright colors)... not all the factors that go into whether he can or can't stay hidden... I thought you said the reference to distraction was irrelevant? Again what about lighting? Efforts taken to blend into the surroundings beforehand and so on... there are numerous reasons the rules or a DM could rule that you stay hidden... thus it is not a blanket rule... Nope, but point me to the posts and I might tell you if I think their biases are perhaps influencing how they are "interpreting" the rules in the book (also total cover does not grant the ability to hide, you realize you could have total cover behind something that is totally transparent, right?)... of course from reading the above it seems that you have now switched gears and went back to talking about the conditions necessary to take the hide action (and you don't mention anything about staying hidden), so which one are we talking about? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I for one hope we don't get "clarification" on many things.
Top