Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I gave up--Here's a Warrior-Mage base class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 7139551" data-attributes="member: 6677017"><p>Hi all! I took some time to think through the class more. I'd like to provide a simplified comparison for ease of analysis. I'd be particularly interested in commentary from those who have looked at the original proposal, including [MENTION=6795602]FrogReaver[/MENTION], [MENTION=6787650]Hemlock[/MENTION], [MENTION=6716779]Zardnaar[/MENTION], [MENTION=6788732]cbwjm[/MENTION], [MENTION=20564]Blue[/MENTION], as well as anyone else who likes to look at these sorts of things.</p><p></p><p>I'm going to take as a baseline for balance the wizard's Bladesong Tradition, since the designers felt it was more or less balanced. My class needs to be comparable in overall balance to Bladesinger.</p><p></p><p>My table will present a simple comparison of essential features level by level, for a skeletal baseline, that should be no more powerful than Bladesinger. Then I'll provide a list of features that can be added, and it would help me greatly if I could get people to basically "say when" when the class hits the point where it is overpowered compared to Bladesinger. </p><p></p><p>Except for what is spelled out on this table and intro, assume that this class's features and stats are identical to a Bladesinger. Ie, you are taking away the stuff in the Bladesinger columns, and adding in the stuff in the Warrior Mage columns. I made an exception by noting where they both gained Extra Attack. You can more or less forget the first post on this thread at the moment—just look at this chart.</p><p></p><p><strong><em>Ability Scores.</em></strong> I'm assuming both characters are half-elves with starting ability scores of Str 8, Dex 16, Con 14, Int 16, Wis 10, Cha 10, and alternate increasing Dex and Int, Dex first. Their final ability score improvement goes to Con.</p><p><strong>Weapons and Armor.</strong> Each character wields a rapier (Bladesinger uses a dagger at level 1) and open hand. I start them with the best armor they can likely afford, and upgrade Warrior-Mage to half-plate at level 3. They use <em>green-flame blade</em> where it will improve their damage.</p><p><strong><em>Melee DPR.</em></strong> This is the difference between the Warrior-Mage's at-will melee damage and the Bladesinger's.</p><p></p><p>Note that The Bladesinger will be using bladesong for most combats, granting them the improved concentration save and AC in parentheses, in addition to its other benefits. </p><p></p><p>Variants: You could change the Warrior-Mage to Strength-based and gain additional damage at the cost of AC. You could also use a shield for a +2 AC boost, but that might interfere with your spellcasting (same issues the Valor bard has with their weapon/armor proficiencies).</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]85148[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Does this baseline Warrior-Mage seem overpowered compared to the Bladesinger? Unless I'm a blind idiot, I'm going to assume most of you will say "no".</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Damage Improvements</span></p><p>With Warrior-Mage lagging behind at levels 14-20, and based on the assumption that they are intended to be superior to Bladesinger in putting out at-will melee damage (while Bladesinger is superior at spell casting), something should be done to fix that. Here are some possibilities to consider.</p><p></p><p><strong>1) War Magic (with or without a third attack)</strong></p><p>If we give the Warrior-Mage War Magic at 8th level, this is how the column for their melee damage compared to bladesinger will look.</p><p>Level 1-7.........Same as above table</p><p>Level 8-10.......+8</p><p>Level 11-13.....+13 </p><p>Level 14-15.....+5</p><p>Level 16.........+3</p><p>Level 17-20.....+7</p><p></p><p>(Why do tabs not work on this forum? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" />)</p><p></p><p>This is a big boost at levels 11-13, keeping them more effective in melee. At levels 14+ it just puts Warrior-Mage back ahead of Bladesinger, countering the Song of Victory improvement—a desirable outcome.</p><p></p><p>If Warrior-Mage gets both War Magic and Extra Attack at levels 18 or 20, the third attack would not affect their damage on the chart. Even if they wielded a greatsword (with the appropriate fighting style), the increase in their damage per round would be less than half a point compared to using War Magic.</p><p></p><p><strong>2) Extra Attack (third attack)</strong></p><p>Without War Magic, getting a third attack at levels 18 or 20 would change their damage compared to Bladesinger at those levels to +5. They would still be behind Bladesinger at levels 14-17.</p><p></p><p>A smooth progression would follow (+3 to +7 damage for Warrior-Mage) at levels 14+ from giving Warrior-Mage either a third attack, War-Magic, or both at level 14. That would seem to be the most mathematically desirable option when comparing to Bladesinger (see issues below).</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The Extras</span></p><p>As you can see, Bladesinger still has a lot going for them in the useful features department, mostly from the wizard class itself rather than from their subclass. We should give Warrior-Mage a little something so they don't feel bland. These extras aren't really there to add raw power, but rather to expand features. We could add any or all of the following.</p><p></p><p><strong>3) Spell Mastery</strong></p><p>Level 20 spell mastery makes a great capstone feature. It won't see much play, but it helps you feel cool when you get there.</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>4) Improved War Magic</strong></p><p>Eldritch Knight gets this at 18th level, while Valor Bard gets it at 14th level. Either one of these works. If balance isn't really an issue, I favor 14th level because doing both magic and melee is kind of their thing.</p><p></p><p><strong>5) Indomitable Spirit (described in OP)</strong></p><p>This one is concept preservation as much as anything. As a blend of warrior and mage, it would be nice if they had a bit more mental fortitude than a warrior, and weren't as much of a rag doll as a wizard. At the same point, an extra save would be way too much. This is a possible solution. A nerfed and limited version of Indomitable addressing only the saves that a fighter or wizard would get that the warrior-mage doesn't. It could easily be split up to hand out only one at a time (Wisdom at about 10th level, then Strength at some higher level), though delaying it too far (to 20th, for instance) would feel off.</p><p></p><p><strong>6) Arcane Specialization (described in OP)</strong></p><p>This one is a personal favorite of mine. I really want to allow things like <strong>minor conjuration</strong>, <strong>minor alchemy</strong>, or<strong> improved minor illusion</strong>. It is supposed to be an occasionally useful toy, not a major power bump. To attempt to address the fact that some traditions simply give more combat relevant abilities, I'm going to propose significantly nerfed versions of most of them.</p><p><strong><em>Arcane Ward:</em></strong> The ward has your level + your Intelligence mod hit point, and you regain the level of the abjuration spell cast. (Instead of twice your level and twice the spell level.)</p><p><strong><em>Portent:</em></strong> You gain only one fortelling die. (Instead of two.)</p><p><strong><em>Hypnotic Gaze:</em></strong> You can maintain this effect on a creature for no longer than 5 rounds.</p><p><strong><em>Sculpt Spells:</em></strong> You can affect only 1 creature.</p><p><strong><em>Grim Harvest:</em></strong> You regain hit points equal to the spell's level, but only if it’s a necromancy spell. (I'm still iffy on this one.)</p><p>I like granting it at 6th level because it showcases their wizardly training, in the same way that fighting style showcases their fighter training.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Issues and Resolving Them</span></p><p>The issue with delaying War Magic to level 14 is that they don't feel quite strong enough as a warrior that way. They shouldn't be outclassing the dedicated warrior classes, but they need to be making more than a token effort at damage output, which is basically what the Valor Bard is doing. In fact, by level 15, the Valor Bard can have all the essential melee battle elements that the Warrior-Mage has at that level, except for a fighting style, and they get all the other bardic goodies to go along with that. It's a delicate balance here, most definitely, but I'd like to get them War Magic at level 8 if at all possible.</p><p></p><p>Reducing Second Wind to once per long rest was an easy sacrifice to weaken the baseline a bit, and those are the sorts of things that work well with the concept.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">What Say Ye?</span></p><p>Anyone willing to play the "say when" game with me?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sword of Spirit, post: 7139551, member: 6677017"] Hi all! I took some time to think through the class more. I'd like to provide a simplified comparison for ease of analysis. I'd be particularly interested in commentary from those who have looked at the original proposal, including [MENTION=6795602]FrogReaver[/MENTION], [MENTION=6787650]Hemlock[/MENTION], [MENTION=6716779]Zardnaar[/MENTION], [MENTION=6788732]cbwjm[/MENTION], [MENTION=20564]Blue[/MENTION], as well as anyone else who likes to look at these sorts of things. I'm going to take as a baseline for balance the wizard's Bladesong Tradition, since the designers felt it was more or less balanced. My class needs to be comparable in overall balance to Bladesinger. My table will present a simple comparison of essential features level by level, for a skeletal baseline, that should be no more powerful than Bladesinger. Then I'll provide a list of features that can be added, and it would help me greatly if I could get people to basically "say when" when the class hits the point where it is overpowered compared to Bladesinger. Except for what is spelled out on this table and intro, assume that this class's features and stats are identical to a Bladesinger. Ie, you are taking away the stuff in the Bladesinger columns, and adding in the stuff in the Warrior Mage columns. I made an exception by noting where they both gained Extra Attack. You can more or less forget the first post on this thread at the moment—just look at this chart. [B][I]Ability Scores.[/I][/B] I'm assuming both characters are half-elves with starting ability scores of Str 8, Dex 16, Con 14, Int 16, Wis 10, Cha 10, and alternate increasing Dex and Int, Dex first. Their final ability score improvement goes to Con. [B]Weapons and Armor.[/B] Each character wields a rapier (Bladesinger uses a dagger at level 1) and open hand. I start them with the best armor they can likely afford, and upgrade Warrior-Mage to half-plate at level 3. They use [I]green-flame blade[/I] where it will improve their damage. [B][I]Melee DPR.[/I][/B] This is the difference between the Warrior-Mage's at-will melee damage and the Bladesinger's. Note that The Bladesinger will be using bladesong for most combats, granting them the improved concentration save and AC in parentheses, in addition to its other benefits. Variants: You could change the Warrior-Mage to Strength-based and gain additional damage at the cost of AC. You could also use a shield for a +2 AC boost, but that might interfere with your spellcasting (same issues the Valor bard has with their weapon/armor proficiencies). [ATTACH=CONFIG]85148._xfImport[/ATTACH] Does this baseline Warrior-Mage seem overpowered compared to the Bladesinger? Unless I'm a blind idiot, I'm going to assume most of you will say "no". [SIZE=3]Damage Improvements[/SIZE] With Warrior-Mage lagging behind at levels 14-20, and based on the assumption that they are intended to be superior to Bladesinger in putting out at-will melee damage (while Bladesinger is superior at spell casting), something should be done to fix that. Here are some possibilities to consider. [B]1) War Magic (with or without a third attack)[/B] If we give the Warrior-Mage War Magic at 8th level, this is how the column for their melee damage compared to bladesinger will look. Level 1-7.........Same as above table Level 8-10.......+8 Level 11-13.....+13 Level 14-15.....+5 Level 16.........+3 Level 17-20.....+7 (Why do tabs not work on this forum? :confused:) This is a big boost at levels 11-13, keeping them more effective in melee. At levels 14+ it just puts Warrior-Mage back ahead of Bladesinger, countering the Song of Victory improvement—a desirable outcome. If Warrior-Mage gets both War Magic and Extra Attack at levels 18 or 20, the third attack would not affect their damage on the chart. Even if they wielded a greatsword (with the appropriate fighting style), the increase in their damage per round would be less than half a point compared to using War Magic. [B]2) Extra Attack (third attack)[/B] Without War Magic, getting a third attack at levels 18 or 20 would change their damage compared to Bladesinger at those levels to +5. They would still be behind Bladesinger at levels 14-17. A smooth progression would follow (+3 to +7 damage for Warrior-Mage) at levels 14+ from giving Warrior-Mage either a third attack, War-Magic, or both at level 14. That would seem to be the most mathematically desirable option when comparing to Bladesinger (see issues below). [SIZE=3]The Extras[/SIZE] As you can see, Bladesinger still has a lot going for them in the useful features department, mostly from the wizard class itself rather than from their subclass. We should give Warrior-Mage a little something so they don't feel bland. These extras aren't really there to add raw power, but rather to expand features. We could add any or all of the following. [B]3) Spell Mastery[/B] Level 20 spell mastery makes a great capstone feature. It won't see much play, but it helps you feel cool when you get there. [B] 4) Improved War Magic[/B] Eldritch Knight gets this at 18th level, while Valor Bard gets it at 14th level. Either one of these works. If balance isn't really an issue, I favor 14th level because doing both magic and melee is kind of their thing. [B]5) Indomitable Spirit (described in OP)[/B] This one is concept preservation as much as anything. As a blend of warrior and mage, it would be nice if they had a bit more mental fortitude than a warrior, and weren't as much of a rag doll as a wizard. At the same point, an extra save would be way too much. This is a possible solution. A nerfed and limited version of Indomitable addressing only the saves that a fighter or wizard would get that the warrior-mage doesn't. It could easily be split up to hand out only one at a time (Wisdom at about 10th level, then Strength at some higher level), though delaying it too far (to 20th, for instance) would feel off. [B]6) Arcane Specialization (described in OP)[/B] This one is a personal favorite of mine. I really want to allow things like [B]minor conjuration[/B], [B]minor alchemy[/B], or[B] improved minor illusion[/B]. It is supposed to be an occasionally useful toy, not a major power bump. To attempt to address the fact that some traditions simply give more combat relevant abilities, I'm going to propose significantly nerfed versions of most of them. [B][I]Arcane Ward:[/I][/B] The ward has your level + your Intelligence mod hit point, and you regain the level of the abjuration spell cast. (Instead of twice your level and twice the spell level.) [B][I]Portent:[/I][/B] You gain only one fortelling die. (Instead of two.) [B][I]Hypnotic Gaze:[/I][/B] You can maintain this effect on a creature for no longer than 5 rounds. [B][I]Sculpt Spells:[/I][/B] You can affect only 1 creature. [B][I]Grim Harvest:[/I][/B] You regain hit points equal to the spell's level, but only if it’s a necromancy spell. (I'm still iffy on this one.) I like granting it at 6th level because it showcases their wizardly training, in the same way that fighting style showcases their fighter training. [SIZE=3]Issues and Resolving Them[/SIZE] The issue with delaying War Magic to level 14 is that they don't feel quite strong enough as a warrior that way. They shouldn't be outclassing the dedicated warrior classes, but they need to be making more than a token effort at damage output, which is basically what the Valor Bard is doing. In fact, by level 15, the Valor Bard can have all the essential melee battle elements that the Warrior-Mage has at that level, except for a fighting style, and they get all the other bardic goodies to go along with that. It's a delicate balance here, most definitely, but I'd like to get them War Magic at level 8 if at all possible. Reducing Second Wind to once per long rest was an easy sacrifice to weaken the baseline a bit, and those are the sorts of things that work well with the concept. [SIZE=3]What Say Ye?[/SIZE] Anyone willing to play the "say when" game with me? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I gave up--Here's a Warrior-Mage base class
Top