Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I got to playtest Castles and Crusades!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fiffergrund" data-source="post: 1455715" data-attributes="member: 17899"><p>My my, have we all become so cynical? How about - gasp - the concept that I may have told the truth as I perceive it, instead of some manipulative marketing-speak?</p><p></p><p>It all has to do with implied permissions. This game is NOT a generic RPG, but it doesn't get in the way of folks who would like to shape it to their own ends.</p><p></p><p>Any game can put a sentence in the preface saying "change it however you like." What differentiates games is whether or not the overall design of each lends itself to easy modularity and "tinkering." HERO, FUDGE, 3E+ - all of them offer flexibility within the scope of the rules themselves - in other words, the designers saw fit to suggest to the players how to alter the game, as well as how to play it, because of the teetering monolith called "balance." </p><p></p><p>1) C&C assumes that each referee knows what's best for the balance of their individual game. (heh, a novel concept, nowadays, trusting the referee)</p><p></p><p>2) C&C's balance isn't going to decimated through removal or addition of systems, it will only be incrementally altered, depending on the nature of the change. More importantly, if the balance *is* altered, the game is transparent enough that the degree of the alteration will be readily apparent to the referee making the change.</p><p></p><p>While other games pay this notion lip service, very often, I've noticed, the rules aren't constructed to suit this philosophy.</p><p></p><p>Does this mean that C&C is the end-all-be-all? Not necessarily. People have their own preferences. All I can speak to is my own experience with it, and as a "D&D" game, it's hands-down the most liberating that I've played that still remains true to the philosophies of the original.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Geoff, it's not "meaningless ad copy." You're speaking from pure ignorance, unless you can read my mind.</p><p></p><p>As a matter of fact, I *do* have specific things I could "rave" about, but I am prevented from doing so by the NDA I signed. I resent the implication that I'm spouting forth empty platitudes for some sort of marketing ploy - I'm simply saying only what I'm allowed to say, which are my true impressions of the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fiffergrund, post: 1455715, member: 17899"] My my, have we all become so cynical? How about - gasp - the concept that I may have told the truth as I perceive it, instead of some manipulative marketing-speak? It all has to do with implied permissions. This game is NOT a generic RPG, but it doesn't get in the way of folks who would like to shape it to their own ends. Any game can put a sentence in the preface saying "change it however you like." What differentiates games is whether or not the overall design of each lends itself to easy modularity and "tinkering." HERO, FUDGE, 3E+ - all of them offer flexibility within the scope of the rules themselves - in other words, the designers saw fit to suggest to the players how to alter the game, as well as how to play it, because of the teetering monolith called "balance." 1) C&C assumes that each referee knows what's best for the balance of their individual game. (heh, a novel concept, nowadays, trusting the referee) 2) C&C's balance isn't going to decimated through removal or addition of systems, it will only be incrementally altered, depending on the nature of the change. More importantly, if the balance *is* altered, the game is transparent enough that the degree of the alteration will be readily apparent to the referee making the change. While other games pay this notion lip service, very often, I've noticed, the rules aren't constructed to suit this philosophy. Does this mean that C&C is the end-all-be-all? Not necessarily. People have their own preferences. All I can speak to is my own experience with it, and as a "D&D" game, it's hands-down the most liberating that I've played that still remains true to the philosophies of the original. Geoff, it's not "meaningless ad copy." You're speaking from pure ignorance, unless you can read my mind. As a matter of fact, I *do* have specific things I could "rave" about, but I am prevented from doing so by the NDA I signed. I resent the implication that I'm spouting forth empty platitudes for some sort of marketing ploy - I'm simply saying only what I'm allowed to say, which are my true impressions of the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I got to playtest Castles and Crusades!
Top