Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I hate Chaotic Neutral
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 2495551" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>However this idea sometimes has bad consequences! I have heard a few players stating that a Neutral (on the good-evil axis) is someone who doesn't care if the goodies or the meanies win the war at the end. Someone like that, who doesn't care whether good or evil triumphs, is EVIL in my vision.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>On the other hand this way of giving Neutral something more that "being in the middle" is just the right way. In fact IMC we always think that:</p><p></p><p>- a Good PC is someone who is going to "help the neighbor" as first reaction, even if he has never seen him before and even if the neighbor isn't good himself (although this doesn't necessary mean to be saint)</p><p>- a Neutral PC is basically the everyday citizen who doesn't hurt anyone, but also who would not sacrifice himself or put himself to danger to help a stranger; he'd definitely help his own family and friends of course, and he'd still help a stranger as long as there isn't a price</p><p>- an Evil PC would mostly help himself only, and would help others only if there's an advantage for him (which means he'd still have friends and comrades, but quite a few); an extremely evil one would actually purposefully hurt others, but it's not necessary</p><p></p><p>IMXP lots of gamers think that evil is only when truly depraved (and they are very disruptive when playing evil campaign). If one thinks so, then it's kind of obvious that Neutral includes people who care for nothing but at least they aren't harming others on purpose, and that Good includes also those who protect their mommies without caring if the neighbor's children are dying of famine <span style="font-size: 9px"> (actually some in RL behave like that and consider themselves good in fact...)</span></p><p></p><p>In the law-chaos axis instead I always had a hard time defining the Neutral, other than being "half-way". I think <em>in practice</em> there are hundreds of little independent behaviours which qualify as lawful or chaotic, and I loathe characters which "have to" be lawful (or chaotic) in EVERY circumstance. I hate when a DM says "you're lawful, you shouldn't tell a single lie" for example. In my view, the law-chaos axis is a continuus spectrum made of thin different strands, on each of which a PC may be more on the right or the left.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 2495551, member: 1465"] However this idea sometimes has bad consequences! I have heard a few players stating that a Neutral (on the good-evil axis) is someone who doesn't care if the goodies or the meanies win the war at the end. Someone like that, who doesn't care whether good or evil triumphs, is EVIL in my vision. On the other hand this way of giving Neutral something more that "being in the middle" is just the right way. In fact IMC we always think that: - a Good PC is someone who is going to "help the neighbor" as first reaction, even if he has never seen him before and even if the neighbor isn't good himself (although this doesn't necessary mean to be saint) - a Neutral PC is basically the everyday citizen who doesn't hurt anyone, but also who would not sacrifice himself or put himself to danger to help a stranger; he'd definitely help his own family and friends of course, and he'd still help a stranger as long as there isn't a price - an Evil PC would mostly help himself only, and would help others only if there's an advantage for him (which means he'd still have friends and comrades, but quite a few); an extremely evil one would actually purposefully hurt others, but it's not necessary IMXP lots of gamers think that evil is only when truly depraved (and they are very disruptive when playing evil campaign). If one thinks so, then it's kind of obvious that Neutral includes people who care for nothing but at least they aren't harming others on purpose, and that Good includes also those who protect their mommies without caring if the neighbor's children are dying of famine [SIZE=1] (actually some in RL behave like that and consider themselves good in fact...)[/SIZE] In the law-chaos axis instead I always had a hard time defining the Neutral, other than being "half-way". I think [I]in practice[/I] there are hundreds of little independent behaviours which qualify as lawful or chaotic, and I loathe characters which "have to" be lawful (or chaotic) in EVERY circumstance. I hate when a DM says "you're lawful, you shouldn't tell a single lie" for example. In my view, the law-chaos axis is a continuus spectrum made of thin different strands, on each of which a PC may be more on the right or the left. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I hate Chaotic Neutral
Top