Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="aramis erak" data-source="post: 6394546" data-attributes="member: 6779310">If you used the High Level Campaigns book, you got more of what you already had. In combination (and it specifically was written to be used in combination with those), it was brutal numbers climb.If you didn't, you still got 10th level spells and more low level spells. And a wider gap between fighters and spellcasters. And thieves with a wider array of thief skills so that they had something to do with their per-level points.And, if you skipped CO:HLC, you had no support for high level play, so you got people kluging it up....And it's not like people didn't extrapolate AD&amp;D 1E to absurd, &quot;just add more of the same&quot;&nbsp; levels, either. I mean, I know of 3 groups in Anchorage (Alaska) alone that had characters worked from 1st to levels 50+ under AD&amp;D 1E or D&amp;D OE. Each had unique spell tables for above 25th level.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="aramis erak, post: 6394546, member: 6779310"] If you used the High Level Campaigns book, you got more of what you already had. In combination (and it specifically was written to be used in combination with those), it was brutal numbers climb. If you didn't, you still got 10th level spells and more low level spells. And a wider gap between fighters and spellcasters. And thieves with a wider array of thief skills so that they had something to do with their per-level points. And, if you skipped CO:HLC, you had no support for high level play, so you got people kluging it up.... And it's not like people didn't extrapolate AD&D 1E to absurd, "just add more of the same" levels, either. I mean, I know of 3 groups in Anchorage (Alaska) alone that had characters worked from 1st to levels 50+ under AD&D 1E or D&D OE. Each had unique spell tables for above 25th level. [/QUOTE]

Verification