Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Glyfair" data-source="post: 3219959" data-attributes="member: 53">This will vary widely from campaign to campaign.  This belongs where it is now, in the DMs hands.  If you want to limit certain types of multiclassing as a DM, then require proper training and backstory.  Requiring that within the core game is a recipe for headaches.  I don't think any mechanical method will really work, and the non-mechanical methods will be ignored.  Perhaps an explicit optional method could be mentioned, though.Honestly, I think metamagic as written is too weak (just using the core feats).  I think a better balance is to require the "free" metamagic to only work if the caster could cast the spell "normally."  (Actually, I'd rather it be rebalanced at the core, so a 7th level spell using a metamagic feat was balanced with a similiar 7th level spell approximately)I don't understand how you are going to limit a fighter uses his weapons every day, but if you have a solution.Really I don't find what you are looking for here.  Some encounters are supposed to be tougher, some are supposed to be weaker.  They are that now.  Typically a CR 8 encounter will be tough for a 5th level party and a CR 1 will be weaker.  What's wrong with that?I disagree strongly.  It's the "jackpot syndrome" again.  Let's roll up characters so I can get a chance of having a much more powerful character than everyone else.  I'll risk the weak character for that chance (especially since I can often convince the DM my character is too weak and get another chance to roll a huge character).In fact, I'd argue that randomness should go out the window in character creation.  Maybe allow an optional method where you roll your stats, class, alignment, sex, etc.</blockquote>

Verification