Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cadence" data-source="post: 6253163" data-attributes="member: 6701124">So, is it more that you already have 3.5 and don't feel PF fixed enough, rather than particularly disliking PF as a game?1) Does everyone in your group have a full collection of 3.5 stuff or is that part of their argument against 3.5?&nbsp;&nbsp; Just went through this with our group wanting to try 13th age and I didn't really want to fork over the dough.&nbsp; (Luckily they just had a 40% off sale and I got the pdf for $14.95).&nbsp; PF is bit nicer in that the srd and prd are extremely complete and include a lot of the classes in the supplements and the pdfs are only $9.95 pdfs.&nbsp; &nbsp; 2) What were the big changes beyond the low levels?&nbsp; (Weren't casters too under-powered at the low levels in 3.5?)3) Back towards 3.5 or in new ways?&nbsp; (The former being an argument for 3.5, the latter being an argument against both).4) An argument against 3.5 too.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cadence, post: 6253163, member: 6701124"] So, is it more that you already have 3.5 and don't feel PF fixed enough, rather than particularly disliking PF as a game? 1) Does everyone in your group have a full collection of 3.5 stuff or is that part of their argument against 3.5? Just went through this with our group wanting to try 13th age and I didn't really want to fork over the dough. (Luckily they just had a 40% off sale and I got the pdf for $14.95). PF is bit nicer in that the srd and prd are extremely complete and include a lot of the classes in the supplements and the pdfs are only $9.95 pdfs. 2) What were the big changes beyond the low levels? (Weren't casters too under-powered at the low levels in 3.5?) 3) Back towards 3.5 or in new ways? (The former being an argument for 3.5, the latter being an argument against both). 4) An argument against 3.5 too. [/QUOTE]

Verification