Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I HAVE IT!! AT LAST, IT IS MINE!!! MINE, I TELL YOU!! MIIIIIINE!!! (LotR)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mirzabah" data-source="post: 365372" data-attributes="member: 3211"><p>Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that you were. For the record, neither was I <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />It's a Willpower check against a "Target Number" (TN - the CODA nomenclature for DC). The TN for a Mild temptation is in the range 5-8; 9-14 for a Strong temptation, and 15-20 for a Very Strong temptation.</p><p></p><p>On further examination of the rules, it isn't quite so bad as it seemed at first. Basically it all depends on how badly you roll - LotR has degrees of success and failure. If you fail slightly, you take a point of Corruption, but resist the temptation. Likewise if you fail moderately, except you take 2 points. If you fail disastrously, you take 3 points and succumb. This means that, yes, you would take the money and spy on your buddies, though the GM may allow additional Willpower checks at her discretion to "throw off the corrupting influence". Corruption points are not taken off, but service is returned to normal.</p><p></p><p>I still don't like it. For one thing: That's a pretty hefty tax just because somebody made you an offer you <em>could</em> - and <em>did</em> - refuse, but you just happened to fluff the roll. You could argue that the chances of it happening are fairly slim, but I say that the chance shouldn't be there - it's completely unnecessary and just doesn't seem fair.</p><p></p><p>It also contradicts the books. Two of the most corrupt characters in LotR - Saruman and Wormtongue - are also two of the most charming. Yet, according to Decipher, they should have serious penalties on their social skills. But then, Corruption is a PC thing - NPCs don't have it. I don't like <em>that</em> kind of thinking either *sigh*.</p><p></p><p>Note also that there is a lopsided-ness to Corruption checks that shows up in other areas of the CODA system. If you fail really badly, you do the bad and gain a lot of Corruption, but if you fail only slightly you just gain 1 Corruption point. On the other hand, the <em>best</em> that can happen is nothing; there's no difference between just barely succeeding and a rip-roaring, feast-upon-the-fatted-calf success - you certainly don't <em>lose</em> any Corruption points or anything symmetrical like that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mirzabah, post: 365372, member: 3211"] Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that you were. For the record, neither was I :)It's a Willpower check against a "Target Number" (TN - the CODA nomenclature for DC). The TN for a Mild temptation is in the range 5-8; 9-14 for a Strong temptation, and 15-20 for a Very Strong temptation. On further examination of the rules, it isn't quite so bad as it seemed at first. Basically it all depends on how badly you roll - LotR has degrees of success and failure. If you fail slightly, you take a point of Corruption, but resist the temptation. Likewise if you fail moderately, except you take 2 points. If you fail disastrously, you take 3 points and succumb. This means that, yes, you would take the money and spy on your buddies, though the GM may allow additional Willpower checks at her discretion to "throw off the corrupting influence". Corruption points are not taken off, but service is returned to normal. I still don't like it. For one thing: That's a pretty hefty tax just because somebody made you an offer you [i]could[/i] - and [i]did[/i] - refuse, but you just happened to fluff the roll. You could argue that the chances of it happening are fairly slim, but I say that the chance shouldn't be there - it's completely unnecessary and just doesn't seem fair. It also contradicts the books. Two of the most corrupt characters in LotR - Saruman and Wormtongue - are also two of the most charming. Yet, according to Decipher, they should have serious penalties on their social skills. But then, Corruption is a PC thing - NPCs don't have it. I don't like [i]that[/i] kind of thinking either *sigh*. Note also that there is a lopsided-ness to Corruption checks that shows up in other areas of the CODA system. If you fail really badly, you do the bad and gain a lot of Corruption, but if you fail only slightly you just gain 1 Corruption point. On the other hand, the [i]best[/i] that can happen is nothing; there's no difference between just barely succeeding and a rip-roaring, feast-upon-the-fatted-calf success - you certainly don't [i]lose[/i] any Corruption points or anything symmetrical like that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I HAVE IT!! AT LAST, IT IS MINE!!! MINE, I TELL YOU!! MIIIIIINE!!! (LotR)
Top