Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I have the worst Paladin ever!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FieserMoep" data-source="post: 7298860" data-attributes="member: 6919650"><p>This is a bit more complex than you think. The praise of adversaries, especially in vitaes, does also serve to raise the glory of those that defeat them. To portray something foreign as noble in certain regards is also "posh". A perfect status quo in written down is also vastly different from what people actually accept as good or okay. Take today time: In theory for any citizen of the western industrial countries it would be good to donate for the poor over in afrika, pay higher taxes for the best healthcare of all people etc. But how many actually do or support that? Not so many. Would we go so far and call their every day live bad? No. Why? Because good/bad is always up to perspective.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So from their perspective they do the good thing because it is their way of live and right to do so.</p><p>Do you think they go to bed and reflect: "Oh boy, today I was evil."</p><p>I doubt that this would account for the entirety of the race.</p><p></p><p>Send slaves to fight against professional warriors? </p><p>Put people into prison?</p><p>There can always be made an argument to what would be the "good" choice yet we take things away from them that could be considered evil.</p><p>We do this for a reason.</p><p>Take away fredom "evil" to protect others "good".</p><p>Kill people "evil" to protect others "good".</p><p></p><p>It always boils down to how we put things into perspective into the agreed upon current norm. And yes, it was a different time pretty much applies to this. Even morality was not invented in modern times, it still was very different. Morality on its own just means that you have a moral, not what kind of rules are part of that morality.</p><p>You may very well think slaughtering an entire town to capture it in a blood bath may be a bit itchy, but then capturing it for the only true faith and getting redemption and forgiveness in the end makes it okay.</p><p></p><p>That was one of the MAJOR drives of the crusades. The absolute and unconditional absolution that was promised. You may do the most horrible things but in the end: Absolution. You are good and pure again, say hello to the paradise. Keep in mind, as you said, the first crusade was an important tool to keep the troublesome nobility in check and stop them from feuding as much as they did at that time. Only with the first crusade became the Miles christianus one of the most identity granting ideals of nobility and knighthood. The dominant institution for morality integrated the fighting class into its rules more tightly and while that prevented some violence amongst those with the same faith, it allowed for the most gruesome cruelty against those that were not.</p><p></p><p>Thing a few years back and slaughtering Chinese in the thousands was pretty much acceptable for European countries. Not to speak of other colonial territories. Sure, they may have always been a few voices against it, but the dominant idea was: Imperalism is friggin great, especially the wealth it brings. If a few natives die, who cares.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FieserMoep, post: 7298860, member: 6919650"] This is a bit more complex than you think. The praise of adversaries, especially in vitaes, does also serve to raise the glory of those that defeat them. To portray something foreign as noble in certain regards is also "posh". A perfect status quo in written down is also vastly different from what people actually accept as good or okay. Take today time: In theory for any citizen of the western industrial countries it would be good to donate for the poor over in afrika, pay higher taxes for the best healthcare of all people etc. But how many actually do or support that? Not so many. Would we go so far and call their every day live bad? No. Why? Because good/bad is always up to perspective. So from their perspective they do the good thing because it is their way of live and right to do so. Do you think they go to bed and reflect: "Oh boy, today I was evil." I doubt that this would account for the entirety of the race. Send slaves to fight against professional warriors? Put people into prison? There can always be made an argument to what would be the "good" choice yet we take things away from them that could be considered evil. We do this for a reason. Take away fredom "evil" to protect others "good". Kill people "evil" to protect others "good". It always boils down to how we put things into perspective into the agreed upon current norm. And yes, it was a different time pretty much applies to this. Even morality was not invented in modern times, it still was very different. Morality on its own just means that you have a moral, not what kind of rules are part of that morality. You may very well think slaughtering an entire town to capture it in a blood bath may be a bit itchy, but then capturing it for the only true faith and getting redemption and forgiveness in the end makes it okay. That was one of the MAJOR drives of the crusades. The absolute and unconditional absolution that was promised. You may do the most horrible things but in the end: Absolution. You are good and pure again, say hello to the paradise. Keep in mind, as you said, the first crusade was an important tool to keep the troublesome nobility in check and stop them from feuding as much as they did at that time. Only with the first crusade became the Miles christianus one of the most identity granting ideals of nobility and knighthood. The dominant institution for morality integrated the fighting class into its rules more tightly and while that prevented some violence amongst those with the same faith, it allowed for the most gruesome cruelty against those that were not. Thing a few years back and slaughtering Chinese in the thousands was pretty much acceptable for European countries. Not to speak of other colonial territories. Sure, they may have always been a few voices against it, but the dominant idea was: Imperalism is friggin great, especially the wealth it brings. If a few natives die, who cares. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I have the worst Paladin ever!
Top