Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I hear Rangers suck. Is this true?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frostmarrow" data-source="post: 156959" data-attributes="member: 1122"><p>I agree that it could be nice with FT from a flavor perspective but I don't see why we can't have flavor without it. For me the ranger concept should include things like ranged weapons, ability to track, almost supernatural senses and an uncanny ability to survive even the harshest conditions. I see the ranger as a rugged outdoors-man who possess abilities honed in the wild that will astound city people. A ranger should be an expert at performing feats with relatively modest resources. A ranger in my mind is swift and deadly (guerilla style) in a war but professional and to the point when hunting. </p><p></p><p>For me the flavor of the ranger is what he knows and how it can apply in civilized territory as well. I don't like the idea of a person suddenly becoming radically worse at hiding, for example, just because he is standing behind a dumpster rather than a big rock. As I mentioned above; no one would suggest that a rogue should become better in a city than in a dungeon so why should the ranger be treated this way? In a medieval society the wilderness might be considered the norm rather than city life.</p><p></p><p>Moreover FT is not just. If a ranger has FT (forest) and the entire campaign takes place in a forest that ranger is at his best all the time. If another ranger is whisked away by the whim of a DM and has to make his way in a series of dungeons, that ranger is never going to be at his best. If we compare this with the fighter we see that a fighter is always at his best. There is always going to be use for a character who knows how to defeat monsters. It doesn't matter if we are going to fight knee deep in mud or on an arena floor - all fighters will always be equally useful. This is not the case with the ranger with FT. It's like creating a fighter who specializes in greatsword and later learn that the greatsword factory has gone chapter eleven.</p><p></p><p>Well, to each his own. If you think FT is a good addition to the ranger you should use it. I think Crocodile Dundee is a good example of a ranger. Dundee can survive on roots in the outback for years and is a marksman with ranged weapons. He can use a knife, a can or a rifle with the same unerring accuracy. He hears or spot things before others do, even though Dundee himself exaggerates this ability a bit. His skills are equally valuable in the NY subway as on his walkabout.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frostmarrow, post: 156959, member: 1122"] I agree that it could be nice with FT from a flavor perspective but I don't see why we can't have flavor without it. For me the ranger concept should include things like ranged weapons, ability to track, almost supernatural senses and an uncanny ability to survive even the harshest conditions. I see the ranger as a rugged outdoors-man who possess abilities honed in the wild that will astound city people. A ranger should be an expert at performing feats with relatively modest resources. A ranger in my mind is swift and deadly (guerilla style) in a war but professional and to the point when hunting. For me the flavor of the ranger is what he knows and how it can apply in civilized territory as well. I don't like the idea of a person suddenly becoming radically worse at hiding, for example, just because he is standing behind a dumpster rather than a big rock. As I mentioned above; no one would suggest that a rogue should become better in a city than in a dungeon so why should the ranger be treated this way? In a medieval society the wilderness might be considered the norm rather than city life. Moreover FT is not just. If a ranger has FT (forest) and the entire campaign takes place in a forest that ranger is at his best all the time. If another ranger is whisked away by the whim of a DM and has to make his way in a series of dungeons, that ranger is never going to be at his best. If we compare this with the fighter we see that a fighter is always at his best. There is always going to be use for a character who knows how to defeat monsters. It doesn't matter if we are going to fight knee deep in mud or on an arena floor - all fighters will always be equally useful. This is not the case with the ranger with FT. It's like creating a fighter who specializes in greatsword and later learn that the greatsword factory has gone chapter eleven. Well, to each his own. If you think FT is a good addition to the ranger you should use it. I think Crocodile Dundee is a good example of a ranger. Dundee can survive on roots in the outback for years and is a marksman with ranged weapons. He can use a knife, a can or a rifle with the same unerring accuracy. He hears or spot things before others do, even though Dundee himself exaggerates this ability a bit. His skills are equally valuable in the NY subway as on his walkabout. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I hear Rangers suck. Is this true?
Top