Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ron" data-source="post: 157426" data-attributes="member: 1020">Hi Frostmarrow,Well, I can see from your post that at least you agree with me that FT makes more sense in a real world perspective. Although I am not into very detailed pseudorealistic games, I think that making sense in a real world perspective a quality every game should go for.Considering your gamewise view. You can always choose underground as FT to help with this kind of adventure. However, you should notice that rangers, in any kind of game, should shine only when the party is outdoors. As such, FT is a pretty good addition. You should remember that a party should go into a limited diversity of terrains.&quot;Return to the dungeons&quot; may be WotC motto for third edition, but, by all means, I don't believe that this implies that they are sugesting to limit adventures to dungeons. If so, they would have dropped the druid and the ranger.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ron, post: 157426, member: 1020"] Hi Frostmarrow, Well, I can see from your post that at least you agree with me that FT makes more sense in a real world perspective. Although I am not into very detailed pseudorealistic games, I think that making sense in a real world perspective a quality every game should go for. Considering your gamewise view. You can always choose underground as FT to help with this kind of adventure. However, you should notice that rangers, in any kind of game, should shine only when the party is outdoors. As such, FT is a pretty good addition. You should remember that a party should go into a limited diversity of terrains. "Return to the dungeons" may be WotC motto for third edition, but, by all means, I don't believe that this implies that they are sugesting to limit adventures to dungeons. If so, they would have dropped the druid and the ranger. [/QUOTE]

Verification