Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 6757598" data-attributes="member: 957">If someone likes two games and one produces new content and the other doesn't, the lack of new content will be a big driver for the majority of people to choose the other game.If they BOTH produce content then the one that produce BETTER content will be the driver.If NEITHER produce content, it doesn't matter because nothing is selling.Pathfinder has been going a long time.I love Pathfinder.I buy practically nothing new for PF because there is so much already out.&nbsp; The new stuff has become marginalized, and often not very great quality.You could say this makes your point.&nbsp; But if you think 5E won't be fading into the sunset six years from now, you are dreaming.Edition turnover is always going to be a fact of life from a market perspective.&nbsp; So looking at PF at this stage of it's existence is not realistic standard.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 6757598, member: 957"] If someone likes two games and one produces new content and the other doesn't, the lack of new content will be a big driver for the majority of people to choose the other game. If they BOTH produce content then the one that produce BETTER content will be the driver. If NEITHER produce content, it doesn't matter because nothing is selling. Pathfinder has been going a long time. I love Pathfinder. I buy practically nothing new for PF because there is so much already out. The new stuff has become marginalized, and often not very great quality. You could say this makes your point. But if you think 5E won't be fading into the sunset six years from now, you are dreaming. Edition turnover is always going to be a fact of life from a market perspective. So looking at PF at this stage of it's existence is not realistic standard. [/QUOTE]

Verification