Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rounser" data-source="post: 3829494" data-attributes="member: 1106">It's a fair cop, but at least the champion can fit in an adventuring party and an army.&nbsp; And even in the role you've defined there, that's a leading role.&nbsp; It also scales to level - a 1st level champion can still be a champion, they're just a very minor, local one.&nbsp; Maybe just some guy who champions the party's cause.Warlord is a strictly &quot;army or politics only&quot; role, so it's definitely the weakest link IMO.&nbsp; Nothing by that name belongs in an adventuring party without extensive extracurricular activities......which don't make sense until high level when you've got lands and legions under your belt.&nbsp; And happen to have a constant habit of fighting wars with them.&nbsp; And a 1st level warlord just doesn't make sense; it's like a 1st level archmage, or 1st level president, as others have pointed out.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rounser, post: 3829494, member: 1106"] It's a fair cop, but at least the champion can fit in an adventuring party [i]and[/i] an army. And even in the role you've defined there, that's a leading role. It also scales to level - a 1st level champion can still be a champion, they're just a very minor, local one. Maybe just some guy who champions the party's cause. Warlord is a strictly "army or politics only" role, so it's definitely the weakest link IMO. Nothing by that name belongs in an adventuring party without extensive extracurricular activities... ...which don't make sense until high level when you've got lands and legions under your belt. And happen to have a constant habit of fighting wars with them. And a 1st level warlord just doesn't make sense; it's like a 1st level archmage, or 1st level president, as others have pointed out. [/QUOTE]

Verification