Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Exen Trik" data-source="post: 3829726" data-attributes="member: 34942">Bah! I've been browsing through thesaurusi for the last hour and a half, looking for a better term to use than warlord. Everything ends up being a partial match, either too specific, too broad, or more suggesting of something that it isn't. Let me list some of what I think are the better ones, and what is good or not so good about them:Guardian+ Has both martial and teamwork themes- Too defensive, not really indicative of a leader roleKnight+ Suggests being charismatic, some mechanics were actually taken from the old Knight class- Too specific, steps on the paladins toes thematicallySoldier+ A martial type team player, but not specifically of any rank or ability.- Again too specific a connotation, and doesn't play up the charismatic angleVanguard+ A term for a leading military force, and a leader of ideas or movements- Still comes across as a defender or striker, and has some political connotationsWarrior+ General enough to cover any abilities the class may have- Too general to be related to any abilities the class may haveOverall, I'd say vanguard is my favorite even if it stretches the definition a little. I'd really have to see the class itself to know what works best though.</blockquote>