Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 2200791" data-attributes="member: 5890">Hey, not every response can be congratulatory back-slapping.The picture of the DM is painted by the fact that his response to a powerful party was "more hitpoints". The fact that said powerful party included ogres and pixies. The fact that his character generation system is "anything wotc goes". The fact that he is utterly unable to challenge you.The picture of you? The fact that you resorted to calling his (second) idea "cheeze-weasel" perhaps? The fact that apparently a character who's a cleric (and therefore must have a good wisdom - the key stat for sense motive BTW...) and only has a "not that good" intelligence has a good idea, and your first reaction is "what's your character's intelligence? He's too dumb to have that idea!"I mean - I'm sitting here, looking at an account given by a guy that I don't know. I'm going to assume that it's biased, because let's face it, noone is totally impartial.So I've got a biased account, and it still comes across making your DM look incompetent, yourself look intolerant, and the guy who's coming up with ideas as picked upon.What sort of conclusion am I supposed to come to? Just assume that because you were the one who posted that you're the good guy?</blockquote>