Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Storm Raven" data-source="post: 1192127" data-attributes="member: 307">I assumed that you didn't. I also know that it didn't come from the actual rules of 1e D&amp;D. You see, since we are talking about how the rules are unbalanced, your citation to a non-rule metric means that your entire argument is irrelevant to the discussion.The concept didn't exist in the rules of the game. Just because it may have appeared in a Dragon article as a variant a decade after the PHB was first published doesn't make it relevant to the discussion.The formula you describe, while potentially useful for evaluating the actual power levels of multiclassed characters is irrelevant for the actual balance as provided by the rules, since the balance provided by the rules is based upon experience points. Basically, your argument is based on something that has no bearing on the balance of the 1e rules.Or, a source that wasn't from then that you are trying to jam into the discussion. (I know you aren't original. Most of the time it seems like the last original thought you had was in 1972 or so).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Storm Raven, post: 1192127, member: 307"] [b][/b] I assumed that you didn't. I also know that [i]it didn't come from the actual rules of 1e D&D[/i]. You see, since we are talking about how the [i]rules[/i] are unbalanced, your citation to a [i]non-rule[/i] metric means that your entire argument is irrelevant to the discussion. The concept didn't exist [i]in the rules of the game[/i]. Just because it may have appeared in a Dragon article as a variant a decade after the PHB was first published doesn't make it relevant to the discussion. The formula you describe, while potentially useful for evaluating the [i]actual[/i] power levels of multiclassed characters is [i]irrelevant[/i] for the actual balance as provided by the rules, since the balance provided by the rules is based upon experience points. Basically, your argument is based on something that has no bearing on the balance of the 1e rules. [b][/b] Or, a source that wasn't from then that you are trying to jam into the discussion. (I know you aren't original. Most of the time it seems like the last original thought you had was in 1972 or so). [/QUOTE]

Verification