Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 9007281" data-attributes="member: 6704184">Yeah, for me, I’ve alway considered the spells to not come from any patron, but rather are things the warlock has learned how todo, shortcuts they’ve found, etc. Of course if it were me warlocks would have ritual casting automatically and better than anyone but wizards. What’s funny about the weird 1/2+ casting model here, is that it’s what I’m looking to do to the artificer with infusions. But artificers aren’t Mages, and doing so doesn’t take anything away from them.&nbsp; good for them?Meanwhile, it’s useful to investigate why, and what can be done to fix it that doesn’t fit the distinctiveness of a class. Like shortening short rests, or changing the recharge to an action or a 1 minute ritual that can be done during a short rest without interrupting the rest, but can also just be done whenever.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 9007281, member: 6704184"] Yeah, for me, I’ve alway considered the spells to not come from any patron, but rather are things the warlock has learned how todo, shortcuts they’ve found, etc. Of course if it were me warlocks would have ritual casting automatically and better than anyone but wizards. What’s funny about the weird 1/2+ casting model here, is that it’s what I’m looking to do to the artificer with infusions. But artificers aren’t Mages, and doing so doesn’t take anything away from them. [I]good for them?[/I] Meanwhile, it’s useful to investigate why, and what can be done to fix it that doesn’t fit the distinctiveness of a class. Like shortening short rests, or changing the recharge to an action or a 1 minute ritual that can be done during a short rest without interrupting the rest, but can also just be done whenever. [/QUOTE]

Verification