Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I LOVE 5th Editon... BUT... (Why No Simple Table of Rituals?) And Other Little Quibbles.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aaron L" data-source="post: 6368473" data-attributes="member: 926"><p>I love <em>all</em> of the illustrations in the PHB! Simple wonderful, all of them. Extremely nice, beautiful, naturalistic fantasy paintings. It made me genuinely happy when I opened the book and saw how it was illustrated. </p><p></p><p>No more "dungeonpunk" for every single illustration in the book. While I don't have a problem with <em>some</em> of the pix in that style (it is set on whole other planets of magic and fantastic alien races, after all,) it got <em>very</em> tiring seeing every single person having spiky hair, wearing spiky armor, wielding wonky, oddly proportioned weapons, and carrying jagged, bizarrely shaped shields that looked like pieces from a broken jigsaw puzzle, which in no way could do their job of covering and protecting the bearer's body. Shields were shaped the way they were for good reasons, and the reasons weren't fashion statements.</p><p></p><p>That was one of the big things I wanted changed in 5th Edition (that wasn't rules related) and spoke out about here and on the WotC forums; that and weapon and shield weights, and shield materials. There was never ever such a thing as a solid "steel shield," and a 15 pound shield would be so heavy as to be utterly useless. </p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, they added a whole new ludicrousity to the rules in 5E; 40 pound heavy armor Ring Mail. First off, Ring Mail is nothing but the product of lazy 19th century historians, who were notoriously arrogant and misguided about anything medieval. They misidentified "chain" maille armor on the Bayeux Tapestry because some was drawn with bigger circles, and so decided it "must" be a different type of armor. The speculated about it and came up with "big metal rings sewn on leather backing" despite there never being any kind of artifact fitting that description found anywhere, nor any description of anything matching it anywhere in the historical record. So they then wrote about this armor they had invented for years, and that's where the early-to-mid 20th century wargamers, and later Gygax, got the description (Charles Ffoulkes, Arms and Armor, 1909, according to a note he made in the magic armor section of the DMG.)</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, it was nothing but lazy historians of the 1800s making stuff up.</p><p></p><p>But even worse than including "ring mail" which might almost kind of work as a glorified studded leather, they made it heavy armor! Fairly obviously because they needed the AC 14 Heavy Armor slot to fill, and someone pulled "ring mail" out of a hat. Unfortunately, 40 pound ring mail heavy armor is ridiculous. Chain "mail" as heavy armor is fine; that stuff <em>is</em> heavy, and covers the wearer head to toe. People didn't stop wearing it because it didn't offer good protection, they stopped wearing it because they found stuff that was lighter and easier to wear. But making "ring mail" a heavy armor is so ludicrous I burst out laughing the second I saw it in the book.</p><p></p><p>I am replacing the AC 14 Heavy Armor with something far more appropriate to its position as a heavy armor. As of now I am considering lamellar, but I'm not quite positive yet. I have to do some more checking and researching. But 40 pound "ring mail" heavy armor is not going to be a part of my D&D; the very idea is so utterly ridiculous as to stand out even amongst all of the other ridiculous weapon and armor weights of any edition of D&D. And that is including 2nnd Edition's laughably stupid 15 pound two-handed swords.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aaron L, post: 6368473, member: 926"] I love [I]all[/I] of the illustrations in the PHB! Simple wonderful, all of them. Extremely nice, beautiful, naturalistic fantasy paintings. It made me genuinely happy when I opened the book and saw how it was illustrated. No more "dungeonpunk" for every single illustration in the book. While I don't have a problem with [I]some[/I] of the pix in that style (it is set on whole other planets of magic and fantastic alien races, after all,) it got [I]very[/I] tiring seeing every single person having spiky hair, wearing spiky armor, wielding wonky, oddly proportioned weapons, and carrying jagged, bizarrely shaped shields that looked like pieces from a broken jigsaw puzzle, which in no way could do their job of covering and protecting the bearer's body. Shields were shaped the way they were for good reasons, and the reasons weren't fashion statements. That was one of the big things I wanted changed in 5th Edition (that wasn't rules related) and spoke out about here and on the WotC forums; that and weapon and shield weights, and shield materials. There was never ever such a thing as a solid "steel shield," and a 15 pound shield would be so heavy as to be utterly useless. Unfortunately, they added a whole new ludicrousity to the rules in 5E; 40 pound heavy armor Ring Mail. First off, Ring Mail is nothing but the product of lazy 19th century historians, who were notoriously arrogant and misguided about anything medieval. They misidentified "chain" maille armor on the Bayeux Tapestry because some was drawn with bigger circles, and so decided it "must" be a different type of armor. The speculated about it and came up with "big metal rings sewn on leather backing" despite there never being any kind of artifact fitting that description found anywhere, nor any description of anything matching it anywhere in the historical record. So they then wrote about this armor they had invented for years, and that's where the early-to-mid 20th century wargamers, and later Gygax, got the description (Charles Ffoulkes, Arms and Armor, 1909, according to a note he made in the magic armor section of the DMG.) Unfortunately, it was nothing but lazy historians of the 1800s making stuff up. But even worse than including "ring mail" which might almost kind of work as a glorified studded leather, they made it heavy armor! Fairly obviously because they needed the AC 14 Heavy Armor slot to fill, and someone pulled "ring mail" out of a hat. Unfortunately, 40 pound ring mail heavy armor is ridiculous. Chain "mail" as heavy armor is fine; that stuff [I]is[/I] heavy, and covers the wearer head to toe. People didn't stop wearing it because it didn't offer good protection, they stopped wearing it because they found stuff that was lighter and easier to wear. But making "ring mail" a heavy armor is so ludicrous I burst out laughing the second I saw it in the book. I am replacing the AC 14 Heavy Armor with something far more appropriate to its position as a heavy armor. As of now I am considering lamellar, but I'm not quite positive yet. I have to do some more checking and researching. But 40 pound "ring mail" heavy armor is not going to be a part of my D&D; the very idea is so utterly ridiculous as to stand out even amongst all of the other ridiculous weapon and armor weights of any edition of D&D. And that is including 2nnd Edition's laughably stupid 15 pound two-handed swords. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I LOVE 5th Editon... BUT... (Why No Simple Table of Rituals?) And Other Little Quibbles.
Top