Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I LOVE 5th Editon... BUT... (Why No Simple Table of Rituals?) And Other Little Quibbles.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Falling Icicle" data-source="post: 6368816" data-attributes="member: 17077"><p>I too love 5e, but the spell index is just awful. Would giving brief descriptions of the spells, organizing the wizard spells by school, or denoting with little M's and R's which spells use expensive material components and are rituals, respectively, really have been so much to ask for?</p><p></p><p>I also have some issues with the presentation of the spells themselves. They could have simply added a target line to the spell header, rather than having to state things like "choose one creature you can see within range" in the description of every spell. A saving throw line in the header would also have been very useful. That, and putting in brackets which classes have each spell under their names (i.e. Magic Missile, 1st-level evocation [Sor, Wiz]) would have saved people a lot of flipping back and forth through the book.</p><p></p><p>I just don't know what on earth they were thinking. Was the PHB really that rushed, or did someone in charge over at WotC actually believe that doing the spells like this would be better?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Falling Icicle, post: 6368816, member: 17077"] I too love 5e, but the spell index is just awful. Would giving brief descriptions of the spells, organizing the wizard spells by school, or denoting with little M's and R's which spells use expensive material components and are rituals, respectively, really have been so much to ask for? I also have some issues with the presentation of the spells themselves. They could have simply added a target line to the spell header, rather than having to state things like "choose one creature you can see within range" in the description of every spell. A saving throw line in the header would also have been very useful. That, and putting in brackets which classes have each spell under their names (i.e. Magic Missile, 1st-level evocation [Sor, Wiz]) would have saved people a lot of flipping back and forth through the book. I just don't know what on earth they were thinking. Was the PHB really that rushed, or did someone in charge over at WotC actually believe that doing the spells like this would be better? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I LOVE 5th Editon... BUT... (Why No Simple Table of Rituals?) And Other Little Quibbles.
Top