Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"I make a perception check."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 8718782" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>This is a variation on an old debate that I have had many times at EnWorld.</p><p></p><p>"I search the room" in whatever form that proposition occurs is one of the most useful shorthands and simultaneously one of the most problematic propositions that a player can make. Consider the situation of the crime boss who has three paintings in his office. Behind one is the safe containing his valuables, and behind two others is an engraved symbol of death. What happens in this room after you've been validating "I search the room" as a GM and the player offers it?</p><p></p><p>That said, I think this particular case is less problematic because if I had to guess Perception checks are not short hand for an active proposition but something that occurs passively. And passive checks are IMO not the province of the player anyway, but something managed by the DM. A player never has to tell me specifically that they are listening or seeing or smelling the environment in a passive way. They may need to tell me that if they are focusing on a particular aspect of the environment like, "I motion everyone to silence while I put my ear to the door and listen" or "I visually inspect the stone sarcophagus" or "I unstopper the bottle and carefully sniff the contents, taking care to not touch or spill anything." But in general, no one has to walk into the room and say, "I try to see things." and telling me "I'm trying to see things." doesn't change the situation. I assume of course they are trying to see things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 8718782, member: 4937"] This is a variation on an old debate that I have had many times at EnWorld. "I search the room" in whatever form that proposition occurs is one of the most useful shorthands and simultaneously one of the most problematic propositions that a player can make. Consider the situation of the crime boss who has three paintings in his office. Behind one is the safe containing his valuables, and behind two others is an engraved symbol of death. What happens in this room after you've been validating "I search the room" as a GM and the player offers it? That said, I think this particular case is less problematic because if I had to guess Perception checks are not short hand for an active proposition but something that occurs passively. And passive checks are IMO not the province of the player anyway, but something managed by the DM. A player never has to tell me specifically that they are listening or seeing or smelling the environment in a passive way. They may need to tell me that if they are focusing on a particular aspect of the environment like, "I motion everyone to silence while I put my ear to the door and listen" or "I visually inspect the stone sarcophagus" or "I unstopper the bottle and carefully sniff the contents, taking care to not touch or spill anything." But in general, no one has to walk into the room and say, "I try to see things." and telling me "I'm trying to see things." doesn't change the situation. I assume of course they are trying to see things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"I make a perception check."
Top