Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"I make a perception check."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8719575" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>OKay, but let me give you a counter example here. </p><p></p><p>You have finished describing an idol. The cleric, who was an acolyte in their backstory, holds up the die and asks "Religion?" Do you really need them to say "I want to think back to my training as an acolyte of the Sun Lord to see if I have heard anything about this idol before."? I mean... it is very obvious they are asking about the idol, and that they are asking if they have run across it in their studies, whether as an acolyte or later. </p><p></p><p>Because the Religion skill proficiency doesn't actually require or state anything about HOW they gained the proficiency. Did they study religious texts? Were they trained by a bard? Did they just grow up and speak to a bunch of old priests? The skill itself doesn't require anything about how you got it, so why am I required to specify why I might know something about something I've never seen before.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But why? Knowledge and perception and insight are completely passive. And by that I mean, I don't make "knowledge" checks in real life by doing any specific action. I just know what I know. If I need to do an action, like pulling out a book or searching my phone, then I'm doing research. And generally, if I have access to research materials, the DM calls for an investigation check to go through them, not a knowledge check. I don't walk into a room and perceive things by taking any specific action. In fact, most of the actions I've seen laid out for "perception" are either altering the environment (throwing in a torch to illuminate the room) or are investigation. Neither of which is meant by a perception check. If I'm listening to someone talk, I don't reach out and grab their face to see if they are lying, or write down their words and reread them to see if they are lying, I'm already doing the pertinent action. Listening and looking.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>By doing what? What action can they possibly take if you have clued them off by saying the NPC is "unusually sweaty" or something. You've either given them enough clues they are just looking to confirm via insight, or they are looking for insight to give them the truth. But most players want to roll to find out if they missed any clues that the person was lying. </p><p></p><p>And it is really hard to look at me acting like the NPC and determine if they are lying, because of course I'm lying, I'm trying to act and I'm a bad actor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8719575, member: 6801228"] OKay, but let me give you a counter example here. You have finished describing an idol. The cleric, who was an acolyte in their backstory, holds up the die and asks "Religion?" Do you really need them to say "I want to think back to my training as an acolyte of the Sun Lord to see if I have heard anything about this idol before."? I mean... it is very obvious they are asking about the idol, and that they are asking if they have run across it in their studies, whether as an acolyte or later. Because the Religion skill proficiency doesn't actually require or state anything about HOW they gained the proficiency. Did they study religious texts? Were they trained by a bard? Did they just grow up and speak to a bunch of old priests? The skill itself doesn't require anything about how you got it, so why am I required to specify why I might know something about something I've never seen before. But why? Knowledge and perception and insight are completely passive. And by that I mean, I don't make "knowledge" checks in real life by doing any specific action. I just know what I know. If I need to do an action, like pulling out a book or searching my phone, then I'm doing research. And generally, if I have access to research materials, the DM calls for an investigation check to go through them, not a knowledge check. I don't walk into a room and perceive things by taking any specific action. In fact, most of the actions I've seen laid out for "perception" are either altering the environment (throwing in a torch to illuminate the room) or are investigation. Neither of which is meant by a perception check. If I'm listening to someone talk, I don't reach out and grab their face to see if they are lying, or write down their words and reread them to see if they are lying, I'm already doing the pertinent action. Listening and looking. By doing what? What action can they possibly take if you have clued them off by saying the NPC is "unusually sweaty" or something. You've either given them enough clues they are just looking to confirm via insight, or they are looking for insight to give them the truth. But most players want to roll to find out if they missed any clues that the person was lying. And it is really hard to look at me acting like the NPC and determine if they are lying, because of course I'm lying, I'm trying to act and I'm a bad actor. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"I make a perception check."
Top