Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"I make a perception check."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 8723904" data-attributes="member: 67338"><p>these are not based on the assumptions of my bad 2e and 3e games. these are based on things said in this very thread... people who said that 2 different declarations can have automatic pass and automatic fail. </p><p></p><p>once you have that as the 3 options auto pass/roll check/auto fail you face this issue that again will break my immersion. the idea of player skill trumping character skill... now if you would ask "how do you calm the queen" and the player says he slaps her like what worked in that old movie the other night and you say 'well i doubt that will work but make your check' then see how the roll goes... or if YOUR idea...</p><p></p><p>lets say that the PC with high cha skills maybe even a feat or invocation to help cha skills, and he needs to get past the guards and you ask what he says, and I will let you pick... something YOU personally think is a dumb thing to say. Tell me what that player says and then how you react. </p><p></p><p>the example of the player with a high cha skill wanting to calm down a crying queen and </p><p></p><p>correct... it's like having a psychological report, an athletic assessment, and and a list of all of there skills and school grades. it wont tell you everything, but it WILL tell you a lot. sometimes things can surprise you, and someone with weak muscles can lift that big boulder that one time, or sometimes a coward can gather some internal strength and stand up to the bully even though there psychological assessment says they wont. </p><p></p><p>now some of this is the fickle d20, some of this is the player choice as it spills into it, and some of it is just the way even our world works let alone theres...</p><p></p><p></p><p>again, then what happens when the player narrates something that his character should be good at, but he says something stupid or at least something you the DM thinks is stupid?</p><p></p><p>remember those 'bad dms' all think they are just making a real world. I doubt they think they are being unreasonable (even if I do). Heck some of them even have regular groups that made it work for years. </p><p></p><p>okay so again I will ask this now based on this even though i did just above... You say you will allow a non face rerolls... but what about when the face says something dumb, and someone with no skill and no stat worth talking about says something you think would work perfectly how do YOU rule it...</p><p></p><p>If I miss read you if the 8cha barbarian with 0 social skills can't just perfectly calm the queen or get the princes's help, or haggle down the price because they the player is good and gives a good argument/narration and the 20 cha skills and feat warlock can't automatically botch it by saying or narrating something you think is stupid then I will admit we actually are more alike and I did miss judge you... I await YOUR example</p><p></p><p>even if failure gets you arrested and you have only a 75% chance... the difference (IMO) between a detailed RP session of how it happened or skipping to the next part is entirely up to the players and the energy they bring. </p><p></p><p>maybe there are 4 different things they plan on doing, and 2 of them seem boaring and 2 exciting... and for this I will use like to like</p><p></p><p>talk past guard, fight the pack of wolves, convince the prince, and fight the demons...</p><p></p><p>if the players are not into talking past the guards but are really into convincing the prince I see no reason to not let them just roll flat for the one they don't want to and let them go into an entire RP session with the next (backed with rolls)</p><p></p><p>if the players say "Look at level 4 we killed 3 wolves, we are level 15 and there are 5 wolves can we just hand wave this" I say sure</p><p></p><p>by the sound of it (and please correct me if I am wrong) you would not let them because even though you know they will most assuredly win with bounded accuracy and pact tactics those wolves can do some damage before the big fight (or at least eat resources) as such as I understand it you would make them play it as it has consequences. </p><p></p><p>now I don't let them hand wave everything. Where an easy to light moderate threat I will let them either auto win or make a single roll each at a DC i make up to see if it cost them something... but no I wont let them end the big bad or a full threat that way (and that is entirely my opion... because I have TPKed on easy encounters and watched my party slam through deadly ones like coolaid man through a wall)</p><p></p><p>it is... and as long as the players are interested I will 100% match there energy... but what if the players want to skip that and get to the next part because they (in this hypothetical all players agree) just don't care about the little problem and want to spend more time that night on the bigger one?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GMforPowergamers, post: 8723904, member: 67338"] these are not based on the assumptions of my bad 2e and 3e games. these are based on things said in this very thread... people who said that 2 different declarations can have automatic pass and automatic fail. once you have that as the 3 options auto pass/roll check/auto fail you face this issue that again will break my immersion. the idea of player skill trumping character skill... now if you would ask "how do you calm the queen" and the player says he slaps her like what worked in that old movie the other night and you say 'well i doubt that will work but make your check' then see how the roll goes... or if YOUR idea... lets say that the PC with high cha skills maybe even a feat or invocation to help cha skills, and he needs to get past the guards and you ask what he says, and I will let you pick... something YOU personally think is a dumb thing to say. Tell me what that player says and then how you react. the example of the player with a high cha skill wanting to calm down a crying queen and correct... it's like having a psychological report, an athletic assessment, and and a list of all of there skills and school grades. it wont tell you everything, but it WILL tell you a lot. sometimes things can surprise you, and someone with weak muscles can lift that big boulder that one time, or sometimes a coward can gather some internal strength and stand up to the bully even though there psychological assessment says they wont. now some of this is the fickle d20, some of this is the player choice as it spills into it, and some of it is just the way even our world works let alone theres... again, then what happens when the player narrates something that his character should be good at, but he says something stupid or at least something you the DM thinks is stupid? remember those 'bad dms' all think they are just making a real world. I doubt they think they are being unreasonable (even if I do). Heck some of them even have regular groups that made it work for years. okay so again I will ask this now based on this even though i did just above... You say you will allow a non face rerolls... but what about when the face says something dumb, and someone with no skill and no stat worth talking about says something you think would work perfectly how do YOU rule it... If I miss read you if the 8cha barbarian with 0 social skills can't just perfectly calm the queen or get the princes's help, or haggle down the price because they the player is good and gives a good argument/narration and the 20 cha skills and feat warlock can't automatically botch it by saying or narrating something you think is stupid then I will admit we actually are more alike and I did miss judge you... I await YOUR example even if failure gets you arrested and you have only a 75% chance... the difference (IMO) between a detailed RP session of how it happened or skipping to the next part is entirely up to the players and the energy they bring. maybe there are 4 different things they plan on doing, and 2 of them seem boaring and 2 exciting... and for this I will use like to like talk past guard, fight the pack of wolves, convince the prince, and fight the demons... if the players are not into talking past the guards but are really into convincing the prince I see no reason to not let them just roll flat for the one they don't want to and let them go into an entire RP session with the next (backed with rolls) if the players say "Look at level 4 we killed 3 wolves, we are level 15 and there are 5 wolves can we just hand wave this" I say sure by the sound of it (and please correct me if I am wrong) you would not let them because even though you know they will most assuredly win with bounded accuracy and pact tactics those wolves can do some damage before the big fight (or at least eat resources) as such as I understand it you would make them play it as it has consequences. now I don't let them hand wave everything. Where an easy to light moderate threat I will let them either auto win or make a single roll each at a DC i make up to see if it cost them something... but no I wont let them end the big bad or a full threat that way (and that is entirely my opion... because I have TPKed on easy encounters and watched my party slam through deadly ones like coolaid man through a wall) it is... and as long as the players are interested I will 100% match there energy... but what if the players want to skip that and get to the next part because they (in this hypothetical all players agree) just don't care about the little problem and want to spend more time that night on the bigger one? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"I make a perception check."
Top