Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 8724074" data-attributes="member: 67338">and again was not the example you responded to at all anyway.and again the 20th level rouge to 1st level wizard example was a detailed search and disarm attempts about traps... so it sounds to me like even though you want to argue with me we both agree... that is a bridge too far.same here... I am pretty forgiving and understanding and let players just speak as they want and i match there energy.and look at that... once again leaving the example where i clearly spelled out "HAS NOTHING IN HIS BACKGROUND TO JUSTIFY IT"if there is a 1st level rogue (who I assume would then have at least prof if not prof and exp in the skills needed) why would I ever let the wizard do it by talking when the rogue could actually do it...let me repost the short version</blockquote>